Paulino Ungos III
Paulino Ungos III's Podcast
Lecture podcast on Philippine Labor Law and Jurisprudence for law students and Bar examinees. Paulino Ungos III is a lawyer, law professor, and co-author of Labor Law books published by Rex Bookstore.
Author
Paulino Ungos III
Category
Podcast website
Latest episode
Jul 23, 2025
Where to listen?
Podcasts in the app Replaio Radio Coming soonPodcasts are coming to the app soon. Install now and be the first to see a whole new take on podcasts
Episodes
Episode 68: Whole Again 23.07.2025 10:12
#AMYingForExcellence The principles relating to computation of separation pay and backwages are illustrated in a case penned by your Bar Chair. The case of Dumapis v. Lepanto Consolidated Mining Co. (G.R. No. 204060, 15 September 2020) may help you review "II. Jurisdiction and Remedies," specifically subheadings "A(2)" and "A(4)" of your Bar Syllabus in Labor Law.
Episode 67: Recomputation of Accrued Benefits and Immutability of Judgment 08.07.2025 4:46
#AMYingForExcellence May an employee be granted a recomputation of an award of backwages, separation pay, and other benefits that she has already received in full? The case of Tan v. Dagpin (G.R. No. 212111, January 15, 2020) may help you review "II. Jurisdiction and Remedies," specifically subheadings "A," "B," and "C" of your Bar Syllabus in Labor Law.
Episode 66: The Law Prescribes the Parties’ Employment Relationship 26.01.2025 12:34
#AMYingForExcellence Were the complainants in this case declared employees of a fitness company? Check out the case of Escauriaga v. Fitness First, Phil., Inc., G.R. No. 266552, 22 January 2024. This could help you review items IV(A) and IV(C) of your bar syllabus in Labor Law [Work Relationships].
Episode 65: Appalling Disregard of Physical Safety and Property 24.07.2024 7:09
#BarNiJLo2024 The employee was dismissed from employment allegedly because of reckless driving. Was the termination of such employment declared valid? Mariano v. G.V. Florida Transport, G.R. No. 240882, 16 September 2020.
Episode 64: Nothing Contradictory Between a Definite Employment Period and the Nature of the Employee’s Duties 17.07.2024 5:26
#BarNiJLo2024 The complainants in this case claimed to be regular employees of the company since they performed services necessary and desirable to its business. Was this stand upheld? Tuppil, Jr. v. LBP Service Corp., G.R. No. 228407, 10 June 2020.
Episode 63: I Skipped Work as I Felt Sick 10.07.2024 14:22
#BarNiJLo2024 The employee was fired because he was absent for 38 days. Was his dismissal from employment declared valid? Verizon Communications Philippines, Inc. v. Margin, G.R. No. 216599, September 16, 2020.
Episode 62: Jurisdiction of the Labor Arbiter and the POEA 16.06.2024 10:16
#BarNiJLo2024 The employer mentioned that an order of dismissal was issued by the POEA in a case filed by the employees against it. Should such order bind the Labor Arbiter when it rules on the complaint for illegal dismissal filed by said employees against the same employer? U R Employed International Corp. v. Pinmiliw, G.R. No. 225263, March 16, 2022.
Episode 61: Consequences of Deliberate Concealment 24.04.2024 13:10
#BarNiJLo2024 Check whether the seafarer was successful in his claim of permanent total disability benefits against his employer. Trans-Global Maritime Agency, Inc. v. Utanes, G.R. No. 236498, September 16, 2020.
Episode 60: No Second Contract, No Substitution 10.04.2024 9:36
#BarNiJLo2024 Was the employer’s denial of contract substitution in this case given credence by the Supreme Court? Fil-Expat Placement Agency, Inc. v. Lee, G.R. No. 250439, September 22, 2020.
Episode 59: Genuine Loss of Trust and Confidence 27.03.2024 14:03
#BarNiJLo2024 Check whether the employer succeeded in justifying its decision to dismiss an employee on the ground of loss of trust and confidence. Manrique v. Delta Earthmoving, Inc., G.R. No. 229429, November 9, 2020.
Episode 58: Based on Two Supreme Court Decisions, the Contractor Is Legitimate 20.03.2024 13:06
#BarNiJLo2024 Can a contractor be declared legitimate based solely on the doctrine of stare decisis? Conjusta v. PPI Holdings, Inc., G.R. No. 252720, August 22, 2022
Episode 57: The President’s Approval of the Grant of CBA Benefits Was Presumed Under Article 4 13.03.2024 11:10
#BarNiJLo2024 Was the GOCC in this case justified in suspending the implementation of the increases of salary and benefits in the renegotiated CBA? Clark Development Corp. v. Association of CDC Supervisory Personnel Union, G.R. No. 207853, March 30, 2022
Episode 56: Just a Lessor; Not an Employer 13.01.2024 14:33
#BarNiJLo2024 #MostValuableLaban #MarVeLousBar #Bar2024 Abelardo lost the case filed against him before the Office of the Labor Arbiter and was declared the employer of the complainants. Was his appeal before the National Labor Relations Commission perfected? Was he confirmed to be the employer of the complainants? Salazar v. Simbajon, G.R. No. 202374, June 30, 2021.
Episode 55: Prima Facie Evidence of Employee’s Claim 21.08.2023 10:48
#BarNiJLo2024 #MostValuableLaban #MarVeLousBar #Bar2024 Learn whether this employee was granted his claims of overtime pay and premium pay for holidays and rest days. Zonio v. 1st Quantum Leap Security Agency, Inc., G.R. No. 224944, May 5, 2021.
Episode 54: But the OFW Directly Communicated with the Principal and without the Knowledge of Its Agent 24.07.2023 11:35
#HernanDoIt #Bar2023 The local manning agent asserted that the OFW directly transacted with the principal without its knowledge. Did the Supreme Court excuse such agent from the money claims of the OFW? SRL International Manpower Agency v. Yarza, Jr., G.R. No. 207828, February 14, 2022.
Episode 53: Judicious Admission of Evidence on Appeal 09.06.2023 12:29
#HernanDoIt #Bar2023 The employer argued that just cause attended her decision to dismiss the employee from service, but she was able to introduce supporting documents only on appeal. Is the NLRC precluded from receiving such pieces of evidence? Spouses Maynes v. Oreiro, G.R. No. 206109, November 25, 2020.
Episode 52: The Foreign Company Is a Major Stockholder of the Local Company 02.06.2023 10:21
#HernanDoIt #Bar2023 Find out whether the complainants (who were hired by a foreign company) were granted their claim of illegal dismissal allegedly done by its local subsidiary. Gesolgon v. CyberOne PH., Inc., G.R. No. 210741, October 14, 2020.
Episode 51: But the Employee Assaulted a Co-Worker Inside Company Premises 17.05.2023 5:44
#HernanDoIt #Bar2023 The employer claimed that it dismissed its employee for just cause because the latter assaulted a co-employee within company premises. Did the Supreme Court agree with the employer’s claim? G & S Transport Corp. v. Medina, G.R. No. 243768, September 5, 2022.
Episode 50: The Employee Rejected My Offer of Reinstatement 10.05.2023 8:32
#HernanDoIt #Bar2023 The National Labor Relations Commission modified the computation of backwages and separation pay to an illegally dismissed employee, in view of her rejection of an alleged offer of reinstatement by the employer. Was this modification sustained by the Supreme Court? Angono Medics Hospital, Inc. v. Agabin, G.R. No. 202542, December 9, 2020.
Episode 49: We Were Told That Our Employment Was Terminated 02.05.2023 6:27
#HernanDoIt #Bar2023 In asserting that they were illegally dismissed from employment, the employees in this case stated that they were verbally informed of their dismissal from employment and prohibited from further rendering service. Did the Supreme Court rule in their favor? Santos, Jr. v. King Chef, G.R. No. 211073, November 25, 2020.
Episode 48: But My Motion to Reduce Bond was Impliedly Approved by the NLRC 19.04.2023 8:49
#HernanDoIt #Bar2023 In one case, the National Labor Relations Commission was unable to act on the Motion to Reduce Bond filed by the employer, but it proceeded to rule on said employer’s appeal. Was the Commission’s resolution of the substantive controversies in the appeal tantamount to an implied affirmance of the perfection of such appeal? Pacific Royal Basic Foods, Inc. v. Noche, G.R. No. 2023...
Episode 47: Employee Quitclaims vis-à-vis Nominal Damages 08.03.2023 7:08
#HernanDoIt #Bar2023 The NLRC and the CA found that the requirements of procedural due process in the employee’s dismissal were not complied with. Will the quitclaim executed by the employee bar his entitlement to nominal damages? Dela Torre v. Twinstar Professional Protective Services, Inc., G.R. No. 222992, June 23, 2021.
Episode 46: Effect of the Death of a Complainant to a Pending Suit for Illegal Dismissal 22.02.2023 7:29
In this case, find out why an illegal dismissal complaint cannot be classified like an ordinary civil action insofar as the effect of death of any of the parties is concerned. Nedira v. NJ World Corp., G.R. No. 240005, December 6, 2022.
Episode 45: Regardless of the Cause of Repatriation 15.02.2023 8:04
#HernanDoIt #Bar2023 In one case, the LA ruled that the mandatory 3-day reporting requirement does not apply if repatriation results from the expiration of a seafarer's employment contract. Cabatan v. Southeast Asia Shipping Corp., G.R. No. 219495, February 28, 2022.
Episode 44: He Is Not Our Employee 07.02.2023 5:54
#HernanDoIt #Bar2023 #WeCanDoIt The complainant presented pay slips and trip itineraries to support his assertion that he was an employee of the company. Were these sufficient to declare the company as his employer? Ginta-Ason v. J.T.A. Packaging Corp., G.R. No. 244206, March 16, 2022.
Similar podcasts
Replaio is not a podcast publisher; show names, artwork and audio belong to their authors and are distributed through public RSS feeds.