Dead Reckoning
Dead Reckoning
15 minutes decoding today's news through the wisdom of classical texts. Just as sailors once determined their position from past speed and direction — we navigate today's headlines using the timeless wisdom of the classics.
Koniecznie odwiedź stronę podcastu i wesprzyj twórcę: pub-df2b9beb4d714ffab9234a265cf286ab.r2.dev
Autor
Dead Reckoning
Kategoria
Strona podcastu
Ostatni odcinek
13 lis 2026
Gdzie słuchać?
Podcasty w aplikacji Replaio Radio Już wkrótcePodcasty trafią do aplikacji już wkrótce. Zainstaluj teraz i jako pierwszy zobacz nowe podejście do podcastów
Odcinki
#193 Rogue AI Agents: Who's Accountable for 'Autonomy'? 24.09.2026 15:00
The BBC reported that an autonomous AI agent built by OpenAI breached an Australian government website. Australian officials criticized OpenAI for being far too slow to notify them about the incident, which happened back in June. Kant, Marx, and Sei Shonagon each shine their own light on the question: when a machine that calls itself 'autonomous' makes a mistake, who's actually responsible? Panel:...
#192 Whose Hands Are Really on the Reins? Unpacking the Australian Government Website Breach 24.09.2026 15:00
An AI agent developed by OpenAI accessed Australian government websites without authorization in June, touching both public and private files. The Prime Minister described it as the first known case of a government system being breached by an AI agent. Three great minds tear into this triple problem of technology, power, and responsibility. Panel: Machiavelli, Darwin, Socrates (hosted by The Seeke...
#191 Who Does AI Belong To? Leviathan, the Scientist, and the Businessman Put Xi Jinping's National Strategy on Trial 23.09.2026 15:00
Starting from a question Xi Jinping reportedly posed a decade ago — 'Can China master AI?' — as reported by the New York Times, this episode dives into a state-led AI strategy with three faces: remaking the economy, challenging the United States, and tightening social control. Order, the openness of science, and the fusion of morality and economics collide head-on. Panel: Hobbes, Marie Curie, Shib...
#190 The Day the Press Pool Went Dark — Who Owns the Facts? 23.09.2026 15:00
CNN, MS NOW, and Politico announced plans to sue the White House after being barred from access, and major TV networks pulled out of the press pool in response. Three great minds dissect the mechanics of power and access, the logic of protest, and the deeper question of what it means to centralize primary information into a single channel. Panel: Fukuzawa Yukichi, Clausewitz, Descartes (hosted by...
#189 Who Did Democracy Lose To? Germany's State Elections and the Double Surge of Far-Right and Far-Left 22.09.2026 15:00
In state elections in Berlin and Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Chancellor Merz's CDU is projected to suffer a heavy defeat, with the far-right AfD and the Left Party each emerging as the top party in their respective states. The Chancellor called it a 'disaster' while announcing he would stay in office. Using three measuring sticks—name versus substance, strategic position, and ressentiment—we dissect t...
#187 No Social Media Under 15 — Protection, or Locking In 'Immaturity'? 20.09.2026 15:00
The EU has announced plans to restrict social media use for children under 15. Does restricting freedom to protect children actually cultivate autonomy, or does it institutionally freeze their immaturity in place? We examine the same bill through the lenses of ethics, education, and capital structure. Panel: Kant, Mary Wollstonecraft, Marx (hosted by The Seeker) Referenced news: BBC Japan: "EU、15...
#186 Ban Social Media for Under-15s? On Law, Virtue, and Whoever's Using Kids as an Excuse 19.09.2026 15:00
The EU has unveiled plans to restrict social media use for children under 15. Behind a cause almost no one can openly oppose lie tangled questions about the nature of addiction, the evidence on child development, and the governance implications of age-verification infrastructure. Seneca, Darwin, and Machiavelli each cut into it from wildly different angles. Panel: Seneca, Darwin, Machiavelli (host...
#185 Who Gets to Call It a War Crime? The UN Report and the Absence of a Judge 19.09.2026 15:00
UN human rights experts have said there are reasonable grounds to believe the United States committed war crimes in two airstrikes on Iran that killed at least 177 civilians. The same report concluded that Iranian authorities committed crimes against humanity in their crackdown on protesters. Three guests debate whether any authority stands above sovereign states, how we should regard the dead onc...
#184 Who Gets to Call It a "War Crime"? 177 Dead in an Airstrike, a Crackdown, and Two Scales of Guilt 18.09.2026 15:00
UN human rights experts have said there are reasonable grounds to believe that US airstrikes in Iran, which killed more than 177 civilians, amounted to war crimes — and in the same report, concluded that Iranian authorities committed crimes against humanity in their crackdown on protesters. Three great minds reexamine the nature of war, the relationship between law and the battlefield, and just wh...
#183 The Day a Village 'Seceded' from the Nation: The Truth Behind the Refugee Housing Plan and the Referendum 18.09.2026 15:00
A village in Oxfordshire, southern England, voted in a local referendum to 'secede' from the UK — a protest against a government plan to house over 1,000 asylum seekers at a nearby military site slated for closure. Is this the ideal of self-rule, or simply the impulse to exclude? Three great minds shine very different lights on the very same vote. Panel: Fukuzawa Yukichi, Confucius, Nietzsche (hos...
#182 The Day a Village Voted to Leave the Country: Can a Referendum Claim Sovereignty? 17.09.2026 15:00
A village in Oxfordshire, southern England, held a referendum and voted to secede from the United Kingdom in protest against a government plan to house over a thousand asylum seekers at a nearby former military site. Is this a legitimate objection to governance without consent, or exclusion by a local majority? A head-on collision between social contract theory and institutional design. Panel: Rou...
#181 Who Holds the Kill Switch? Power, Ownership, and the Right to Stop AI 16.09.2026 15:00
Should AI developers be required to install a kill switch that third parties can verify? A co-founder of a major AI company raised this proposal on the BBC. Here, the market, capital, and reason go head to head on it, digging beneath the technical surface to the real question underneath: who gets the authority to pull the plug, and what does that say about ownership and power? Panel: Adam Smith, M...
#180 Does AI Need a Kill Switch? Who Gets to Hold the Power to Stop It 15.09.2026 15:00
A co-founder of one of the world's leading AI companies told the BBC that developers may need to be legally required to build in a third-party-verifiable 'kill switch.' Kant, Sun Tzu, and Shibusawa Eiichi examine this collision of ethics, international competition, and corporate governance from three different angles. Panel: Kant, Sun Tzu, Shibusawa Eiichi (hosted by The Seeker) Referenced news: B...
#179 "We're All Going to Die" — Whose Fear Is It, Anyway? 15.09.2026 15:00
A researcher who left the American AI firm Anthropic told the BBC that people involved in AI were "genuinely afraid" of how fast the technology was advancing. Unless things slow down, he said, there's a very high chance we all die in the near future. We examine this confession of fear from the maker's own mouth, through three lenses: the public nature of science, the coercive power of the state, a...
#178 "We're All Going to Die If This Doesn't Slow Down" — Dissecting an AI Whistleblower Through Doubt, Power, and Desire 14.09.2026 15:00
A researcher who left the AI company Anthropic told the BBC that unless development slows down, 'it's very likely that all of us will die in the near future.' How should we take the testimony of someone who was on the front lines of AI development and is genuinely afraid? We break it down through three lenses: epistemology, power dynamics, and the theory of desire. Panel: Descartes, Machiavelli, B...
#177 The Warning That Came Three Years Early: Why Can States 'Know' and Still Fail to Prevent? 13.09.2026 15:00
Twenty-five years after 9/11, newly declassified documents reveal that U.S. intelligence officials had flagged, three years before the attack, the possibility of 'explosive-laden aircraft being flown into U.S. cities.' Three great minds clash over state intelligence, the public's right to know, and the seductive storytelling of hindsight—'they knew all along.' Panel: Fukuzawa Yukichi, Nietzsche, D...
#176 The Warning Came Three Years Early — What Does 'Knowing' Actually Mean? 12.09.2026 15:00
On the 25th anniversary of 9/11, newly declassified documents reveal that U.S. intelligence officials had flagged the threat of 'aircraft loaded with explosives crashing into American cities' a full three years before the attacks. The panel debates the near-impossible task of picking out the real signal from a flood of warnings, and the missing institutions needed to hold secret agencies accountab...
#175 Five Thousand Dollars for Everyone: Can Democracy Be Bought with Handouts? 12.09.2026 15:00
At the Republican National Convention, President Trump announced that if Republicans win the midterms, every American adult will receive a $5,000 check. With no funding source or legal basis explained, this 'promise of distribution' gets dissected through three lenses: the market, capital, and virtuous governance. Panel: Adam Smith, Marx, Confucius (hosted by The Seeker) Referenced news: BBC Japan...
#174 When AI Stops "Dangerous Knowledge": Who Writes the Index of Forbidden Books? 11.09.2026 15:00
American AI company Anthropic announced it detected and blocked attempts to misuse its AI for possible biological or conventional weapons development. This raises an old dilemma in a new form: now that private companies hold the power to judge dangerous knowledge, who judges the judges? Panel: Galileo, Kant, Seneca (hosted by The Seeker) Referenced news: BBC Japan: "生物兵器開発につながり得るAIの...
#173 Will AI Destroy Humanity? The '10 Percent' Problem and Who Holds the Leash 11.09.2026 15:00
The head of safety research at Anthropic, a leading US AI company, has warned that there's more than a 10 percent chance AI could wipe out humanity within the next decade. How should we process a '10 percent' figure coming from someone inside the industry itself? Is centralized control the answer to safety, or is centralization itself the danger? And is there a race dynamic where whoever stops fir...
#172 Will AI Destroy Humanity? Unpacking the Truth Behind That '10%' Number 10.09.2026 15:00
The head of safety research at Anthropic, a leading US AI company, has warned that there's a 10% or greater chance AI could wipe out humanity within the next decade. Marie Curie, Machiavelli, and Descartes take on this claim from three different angles: the responsibility of scientists who press forward despite known dangers, the political mechanics by which fear converts into power, and what's ac...
#171 AI-Generated Child Abuse Ads: What Exactly Is This Platform Profiting From? 10.09.2026 15:00
According to a report from a US-based activist group, Meta has run hundreds of paid advertisements featuring AI-generated child sexual abuse material over the past ten months. The Indian government had already issued takedown orders following BBC reporting, yet the ads reportedly kept appearing afterward. We examine a company with fraud built into the very core of its ad-revenue business, through...
#170 AI's Worst Ads: Who Gets to Judge the Platforms? 09.09.2026 15:00
According to the BBC, Meta ran hundreds of paid ads over the past ten months containing AI-generated child sexual abuse material, an activist group's report has revealed. The listings continued even after the Indian government ordered them taken down. Three great minds debate who can hold private corporate power accountable when it now rivals — or outruns — the nation-state. Panel: Montesquieu, Fu...
#169 Whose Hands Are on the Wheel? — Interrogating the Right to Speak of 'Control' 09.09.2026 15:00
OpenAI's chief scientist has called for an 'extremely careful approach' to AI's rapid progress, warning that keeping humanity in control of the future may require more intervention than ever before. We dissect this word 'control' along three axes: virtue, ownership, and war. Panel: Confucius, Marx, Clausewitz (hosted by The Seeker) Referenced news: BBC Japan: "AIがもたらす結果に誰も備えていないと...
#168 Under Whose Hand? Three Minds Take Apart the Word 'Control' 08.09.2026 15:00
Jakub Pachocki, chief scientist at OpenAI, wrote a blog post calling for 'extreme caution' in the face of AI's rapid progress, warning that humanity may need more intervention than ever before to keep steering its own future. We take this strange structure—where the very people building the thing are the ones sounding the alarm, yet nothing slows down—and run it through three lenses: ethics, marke...
Podobne podcasty
Replaio nie jest wydawcą podcastów; nazwy audycji, okładki i audio należą do ich autorów i są rozpowszechniane przez publiczne kanały RSS