Free Speech Arguments

Episode 29:   Institute for Free Speech v. J.R. Johnson, et al.  Institute for Free Speech v. J.R. Johnson, et al.  argued before Chief Judge Jennifer Walker Elrod and Judges Kurt D. Engelhardt and Greg Gerard Guidry in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on April 28, 2025. Argued by Del Kolde (on behalf of the Institute for Free Speech) and Cory R. Liu (on behalf of J.R. Johnson, et a...

Episode 28: Associated Press v. Taylor Budowich   Associated Press v. Taylor Budowich , argued before a three-judge panel in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit on April 17, 2025. Argued by Eric D. McArthur (on behalf of Appellants Taylor Budowich, et al.) and Charles D. Tobin (on behalf of Appellee Associated Press). Lawyers for the Trump administration are seeking a stay on the DC Distr...

Episode 27:  Local 8027, AFT-New Hampshire, AFL-CIO v. Edelblut Local 8027, AFT-New Hampshire, AFL-CIO v. Edelblut , argued before Circuit Judge Lara Montecalvo, Senior Circuit Judge William J. Kayatta, Jr., and Circuit Judge Seth Aframe in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit on April 8, 2025. Argued by Charles G. Moerdler and Gilles R. Bissonnette (on behalf of Local 8027, AFT-New Ham...

Episode 26: Parents Defending Education v. Olentangy Local School District, et al. Parents Defending Education v. Olentangy Local School District , argued before the en banc U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on March 19, 2025. Argued by Cameron Norris (on behalf of Parents Defending Education); Elliott Gaiser, Solicitor General of Ohio (on behalf of Ohio and 22 other states as amici curi...

Episode 25:  Powell, et al. v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission Powell, et al. v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission , argued before Circuit Judges Sidney R. Thomas, Daniel A. Bress, and Ana de Alba in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on February 13, 2025. Argued by Margaret A. Little of the  New Civil Liberties Alliance  (NCLA) (on behalf of Powell, et...

Episode 24: Henderson v. Springfield R-12 School District Henderson v. Springfield R-12 School District, argued en banc before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit on January 15, 2025. Argued by Braden H. Boucek of the  Southeastern Legal Foundation  (on behalf of Brooke Henderson, et al.) and Tina Fowler (on behalf of the Board of Education of the Springfield R-12 School District, et...

Episode 23:  Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton , argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on January 15, 2025. Argued by Derek L. Shaffer (on behalf of Free Speech Coalition, et al.), Brian H. Fletcher, Deputy Solicitor General of the United States (on behalf of the United States as amicus curiae), and Aaron Nielson, Solicitor General of Texas...

Episode 22:  TikTok Inc. V. Merrick Garland TikTok Inc. v. Merrick Garland , argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on January 10, 2025. Argued by Noel Francisco (on behalf of TikTok, Inc. and ByteDance, Ltd.) and Jeffrey Fisher (on behalf of Creator Petitioners Brian Firebaugh, et al.), and Elizabeth Prelogar, Solicitor General of the United States (on behalf of Merrick Garland). Ba...

Episode 21:  Bristol Myers Squibb Co v. Secretary United States Department of HHS Bristol Myers Squibb Co. v. Secretary United States Department of HHS , consolidated under  AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al v. Secretary United States Department of HHS , argued before Circuit Judges Thomas M. Hardiman, Peter J. Phipps, and Arianna J. Freeman in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on...

Episode 20:  Moms for Liberty v. Wilson County Board of Education Moms for Liberty – Wilson County, TN, et al. v. Wilson County Board of Education, et al. , argued before Circuit Judges Jane Branstetter Stranch, Amul R. Thapar, and Eric E. Murphy in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on October 29, 2024. Argued by Brett R. Nolan, Senior Attorney, Institute for Free Speech (on behalf o...

Episode 19: Central Maine Power Company, et al. v. Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices, et al. Central Maine Power Company, et al. v. Maine Commission on Governmental Ethics and Election Practices, et al. , argued before Circuit Judge Lara Montecalvo, Senior Circuit Judge Jeffrey R. Howard, and Circuit Judge Seth Aframe in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit...

Episode 18:  Little v. Llano County Little, et al. v. Llano County, et al. , argued  en banc  before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on September 24, 2024. Argued by Jonathan F. Mitchell (on behalf of Llano County, et al.), Henry Charles Whitaker (on behalf of Amici Curiae States supporting Llano County), and Matthew Borden (on behalf of Little, et al.). Statement of Issues Present...

TikTok Inc. v. Merrick Garland , argued before Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan, Circuit Judge Neomi Rao, and Senior Circuit Judge Douglas H. Ginsburg in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on September 16, 2024. Argued by Andrew J. Pincus (TikTok petitioners),  Jeffrey L. Fisher (TikTok creator petitioners), and Daniel Tenny (on behalf of Merrick Garland). Background on the c...

NetChoice, LLC v. Bonta , argued before Judges Milan D. Smith, Jr., Mark J. Bennett, and Anthony D. Johnstone in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on July 17, 2024. Argued by Robert Corn-Revere (on behalf of NetChoice, LLC) and Kristin Liska, Deputy Attorney General (on behalf of Robert Bonta, Attorney General of the State of California). A Description of the Law, from the  Appellee’...

X Corp. v. Bonta , argued before Judges Milan D. Smith, Jr., Mark J. Bennett, and Anthony D. Johnstone in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on July 17, 2024. Argued by Joel Kurtzburg (on behalf of X Corp.) and Gabrielle D. Boutin, Deputy Attorney General (on behalf of Robert Bonta, Attorney General of the State of California). A Description of the Law, from the  Appellant’s Opening B...

The Imperial Sovereign Court of the State of Montana v. Knudsen, argued before Judges Johnnie B. Rawlinson, Danielle J. Forrest, and Jennifer Sung in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on June 4, 2024. Argued by Michael Russell (on behalf of Knudsen, et al.) and Constance Van Klay (on behalf of the Imperial Sovereign Court of the State of Montana, et al.). Description of the Case, fro...

Nicholas Somberg v. Karen McDonald, argued before Senior Judge Alice M. Batchelder, Judge Amul R. Thapar, and Judge Andre B. Mathis in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on June 12, 2024. Argued by Philip L. Ellison (on behalf of Nicholas Somberg) and Brooke E. Tucker (on behalf of Karen McDonald). Statement of Question Presented, from the Appellant’s Brief : Plaintiff Nicholas Somber...

LeRoy Pernell, et al. v. Brian Lamb, et al.  (consolidated with  Adriana Novoa, et al. v. Commissioner of the Florida State Board of Education, et al. ), argued before Judges Charles R. Wilson, Britt C. Grant, and Barbara Lagoa in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit on June 14, 2024. Argued by Charles Cooper (on behalf of Brian Lamb, et al.) and Leah Watson (on behalf of Appellees L...

National Republican Senatorial Committee, et al. v. Federal Election Commission, et al.  argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit sitting en banc on June 12, 2024. Argued by Noel J. Francisco on behalf of the NRSC and Jason Hamilton on behalf of the FEC. The Question of Constitutionality Certified by the  ⁠District Court⁠ : Do the limits on coordinated party expenditures in §...

U.S. v. Sittenfeld , argued before Judges John K. Bush, John B. Nalbandian, Eric E. Murphy in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on May 9, 2024 Statement of the Issues, from the Appellant’s Opening Brief: 1. Whether objectively ambiguous evidence can prove an “explicit”  quid pro quo , and whether the concededly ambiguous evidence here sufficed to do so. 2. Whether the Government cons...

Diei v. Boyd , argued before Judges Joan L. Larsen, Chad A. Readler, and Stephanie Dawkins Davis in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on May 2, 2024 Statement of the Issues, from the Appellant’s Opening Brief: 1. The First Amendment bars public university officials from punishing students for their protected speech under the guise of professionalism policies. Defendants investigated...

Spectrum WT v. Wendler , argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on April 29, 2024. The argument was heard by Judges James L. Dennis, Leslie H. Southwick and James C. Ho. Excerpted from the Brief for Plaintiffs-Appellants : Spectrum WT is a longstanding, recognized student organization at West Texas A&M . . . [I]n November 2022, Spectrum WT started planning a March 31, 20...

Joseph W. Fischer  v. United States , argued before the Supreme Court of the United States on April 16, 2024 From the Petition for a Writ of Certiorari: Petitioner Joseph W. Fischer . . . attended the Stop the Steal rally on January 6. Unlike many of the other attendees, Mr. Fischer did not subsequently march with the crowd to the Capitol. . . . But after learning of the swelling demonstration, Mr...

United States v. Douglass Mackey , argued before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 5, 2024. Panel: Debra Ann Livingston, Chief Judge, and Judges Reena Raggi and Beth Robinson. Most of this argument does not address the First Amendment issues present in this case, but those issues do get discussed and could impact the ruling. From the Opening Brief of Defendant-Appe...

Leah Gilliam v. David Gerregano, Commissioner of the Tennessee Department of Revenue, et al. , argued before the Supreme Court of Tennessee on April 3, 2024. From the Court of Appeals Opinion: Citizens of Tennessee may apply to the Tennessee Department of Revenue (the “Department”) for license plates featuring unique, personalized messages. Tennessee Code Annotated section 55-4-210(d)(2) provides...