The End: Letters from the Tribulation

Micah responds to Chris White's arguments that the Rome view makes more sense chronologically, is more consistent with Revelation 17, has no theological issues, and also conquered Babylon thus qualifying it as the better choice. Chris White's rebuttals to Joel Richardson can be found on the 'Bible Prophecy Daily' podcast.

Micah summarizes the previous three episodes (Daniel 2 & 7, Revelation 13), explains Revelation 17 verse by verse, reads from Augustine's City of God, and highlights the inability of Rome to be the final beast kingdom.

Micah explains his plans to respond to Chris White's rebuttal for the Rome view, connects Revelation 13 back to Daniel 7, and highlights his new mail club.

Micah runs through Daniel 7 and highlights the descriptions of the fourth kingdom, notes the importance of 666, and implores people to be consistent with the meaning of a king or people 'gaining sovereignty and dominion on the earth' throughout the book of Daniel.

Micah introduces Daniel 2:40, talks about the context of who the dream was given to, references the previous kingdoms, and explains why the Islamic Caliphate is a better fit than Rome when scripture is considered.

Micah rants about predestination, considers how much of our lives are determined by God, and presents the "Front End & Back End" analogy that helps us accept that things are the way they are.

Micah shares the key end times positions he was learning about around the time of the dream, and the four things he has held to based off his analysis of scripture. He explains the identity of the last beast kingdom, the fulfillment of the 3.5 years (second half of Daniel's 70th week), how to view Israel, and the proper way to interpret the phrase "1000 years."

Micah explains a dream he had about the end of the world that was given to him by God, confirms how related scripture can be seen throughout, and reassures his listeners that he has nothing to add to God's word.

Micah explains how Isaiah 66:2 & 1 Cor. 13:2 inform his approach to handling disagreements in eschatological discourse, why being on a desert island can help disconnect your emotions from your beliefs, and why people that are offended aren't always right.

Micah lists the verses that reference this 3.5 year period ("Time, Times, Half a Time"), talks about the implications for different eschatological views, and reads some thoughts from early church fathers.

Micah rants about Partial Preterism, the 3.5 year/42 month/1260 day period, and whether or not Amils and Postmils are required to be Partial Preterist.

Micah rants about the Pretrib rapture, reviews some of the material he has released on Instagram, and talks about the notion of God "beating up His bride."

Micah discusses the plausibility of the 1000 year-week theory regarding the creation week, explains 2 Peter 3:8, and mentions some comments from Irenaeus and Hippolytus.

Micah looks at the context of Revelation 19 and 20, summarizes the logical problems for Amil and Postmil theologians, and gives the concluding reasons why "1000 years" should be viewed as a literal 1000 year period.

Micah analyzes the number 1000 in the Old and New Testaments (looking at Deut. 1:11, 7:9; Psalm 50:10; Psalm 90:4; Ecc. 6:6; 2 Peter 3:8), explains number usage with normative context, explains binomial idioms, and shares something from Augustine's City of God that will knock your socks off.

Micah analyzes the top three arguments from Amil and Postmil theologians regarding the symbolic nature of the 1000 years in Revelation 20, and briefly reads sections from Sam Storms and David Chilton.

Micah explains the weak interpretation of the phrase "1000 years" from theologians on all sides, symbolic and literal numbers, and the need to address "1000 years" in an adequate manner.

Micah explains how to study eschatology on a desert island, linchpin arguments, and the origin of having information "down pat."