Sub Deo et Lege

Ep. 34. In which we consider Chapter 1 of Magnifica Humanitas. 09.06.2026 51:11 ↓

Ep. 34. In which we consider Chapter 1 of Magnifica Humanitas.

Ep. 33. In which we consider for the first time together Magnifica Humanitas. 27.05.2026 48:35 ↓

Ep. 33. In which we consider for the first time together Magnifica Humanitas.

Ep. 32. In which we discuss proposed assisted suicide legislation for Virginia. 09.03.2026 46:30 ↓

Ep. 32. In which we discuss proposed assisted suicide legislation for Virginia.

Ep. 31. In which we discuss legal essences and "religion" in a recent case. 05.03.2026 48:10 ↓

Ep. 31. In which we discuss legal essences and "religion" in a recent case.

Ep. 30. In which we reflect on what Catholics believe about the roots of law and rights. 11.09.2025 47:02 ↓

Ep. 30. In which we reflect on what Catholics believe about the roots of law and rights.

Ep. 29. In which we discuss a new moment of civic renewal in higher education with Lee Strang. 06.08.2025 50:09 ↓

Ep. 29. In which we discuss a new moment of civic renewal in higher education with Lee Strang.

Ep. 28. In which we discuss establishment, disestablishment, conscience, and conformity with Prof. Nathan Chapman in connection with his co-authored book. 30.07.2025 53:35 ↓

Ep. 28. In which we discuss establishment, disestablishment, conscience, and conformity with Prof. Nathan Chapman in relation to his book with Prof. Michael McConnell.

Ep. 27. In which we discuss Providence and godlessness in America with Professor Steven Smith in his new book. 22.07.2025 53:28 ↓

Ep. 27. In which we discuss Providence and godlessness in America with Professor Steven Smith in his new book.

Ep. 26. In which we offer some guarded rapid reactions in real-time to the opinions on the last day of the Supreme Court’s term. 27.06.2025 1:23:26 ↓

Ep. 26. In which we offer some guarded rapid reactions in real-time to the opinions on the last day of the Supreme Court’s term.

Ep. 25. In which we discuss what a required Jurisprudence course in a Catholic law school just might be today. 15.05.2025 39:25 ↓

Ep. 25. In which we discuss what a required Jurisprudence course in a Catholic law school just might be today.

Ep. 24. In which we go "old school" once again to discuss a new book by an old friend on the dark secrets of lethal injection. 06.05.2025 42:56 ↓

Ep. 24. In which we go "old school" once again to discuss a new book by an old friend on the dark secrets of lethal injection.

Ep. 23. In which we reflect on the legal categories of status, conduct, belief, and message with an old friend. 25.04.2025 40:22 ↓

Ep. 23. In which we reflect on the legal categories of status, conduct, belief, and message with an old friend.

Ep. 22. In which we discuss Section 25 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 and Calder v. Bull in light of an upcoming symposium in Connecticut. 10.04.2025 42:12 ↓

Ep. 22 In which we discuss Section 25 of the Judiciary Act of 1789 and Calder v. Bull in light of an upcoming symposium in Connecticut.

Ep. 21. In which we reflect on ABA accreditation requirements and the semiotics of group academic letters. 07.04.2025 41:09 ↓

Ep. 21. In which we reflect on ABA accreditation requirements and the semiotics of group academic letters.

Ep. 20. In which we converse with representatives of the Catholic Law faculty "youth movement" while they roam abroad presenting scholarly papers. 20.03.2025 45:38 ↓

Ep. 20. In which we converse with representatives of the Catholic Law faculty "youth movement" while they roam abroad presenting scholarly papers.

Ep. 19. In which we discuss with Mary Catherine Martin what Virginia can learn from the process that led to Missouri's "Death Star" Amendment 3. 13.03.2025 42:24 ↓

Ep. 19. In which we discuss with Mary Catherine Martin what Virginia can learn from the process that led to Missouri's "Death Star" Amendment 3.

Ep. 18. In which we consider whether Rahimi was right in relation to the rise of modern judicial review as explained by Prof. Christopher Wolfe. 05.03.2025 43:51 ↓

Ep. 18. In which we consider whether Rahimi was right in relation to the rise of modern judicial review as explained by Prof. Christopher Wolfe.

Ep. 17. In which we welcome our Columbus Law colleague and friend Prof. Joel Alicea to discuss his forthcoming law review article, Bruen Was Right. 28.02.2025 42:16 ↓

Ep. 17. In which we welcome our Columbus Law colleague and friend Prof. Joel Alicea to discuss his forthcoming law review article, Bruen Was Right.

Ep. 16. In which we commend lawyers to read Thomas Hobbes, and we acknowledge Charlemagne the Dog. 19.02.2025 40:01 ↓

Ep. 16. In which we commend lawyers to read Thomas Hobbes, and we acknowledge Charlemagne the Dog.