Rushdoony Radio

Submission isn’t a call to “sit down and take it”—it’s a call to God-directed action. This message exposes how Christians can confuse biblical submission with medieval-style passivity (think “Patient Griselda”) or—on the other extreme—Jesuit-like, unquestioning loyalty to men and institutions. Instead, Scripture anchors submission first in God’s Word, then shows how real change comes not through r...

Modern man, this passage argues, is caught in a grim contradiction: he longs for an “end” that would wipe everything clean, yet he fears death, rejects judgment, and even protests capital punishment while fantasizing about a humanistic doomsday. That paradox is traced to humanism—man enthroned as lord, feelings elevated to the standard of right and wrong, and God’s Law dismissed as irrelevant—so t...

This teaching confronts one of the most abused phrases in Scripture—“love your neighbor as yourself”—and restores its biblical meaning by grounding love firmly in God’s law, not emotion, socialism, or sentimental tolerance of evil. Drawing from Romans 13, Leviticus 19, the teachings of Christ, and the Good Samaritan, it argues that biblical love is juridical and covenantal: to love one’s neighbor...

This meditation frames God’s absolute sovereignty as the ground of Christian confidence: though the nations rage and conspire, His throne stands fast, and believers are called to boldness, discipline, and victory under His government. Using Proverbs 12:10 (“A righteous man regardeth the life of his beast: but the tender mercies of the wicked are cruel”), it explains biblical wisdom as concrete pre...

Sacrilege, biblically defined as “robbing God,” is not a forgotten superstition but a central Scriptural reality with enduring consequences. From Achan’s theft of what belonged to the Lord, to the judgment pronounced on Jericho, to the long-term national fallout following Henry VIII’s seizure of church property, Scripture and history testify that what is consecrated to God cannot be safely taken o...

Rushdoony argues the church’s crisis is moral blindness: Christians often treat the unbelieving neighbor as basically good and needing only “Christ added,” but Scripture teaches universal depravity and that, without the church acting as salt, society naturally decays into greater evil and eventually turns on Christians. True community requires something genuinely held in common, yet modern substit...

Rushdoony says “community” originally meant communion a shared life grounded in Christ, not merely people living near each other. In Christendom, the Lord’s Table was the basis of real community: believers were “members one of another,” obligated to mutual care and justice. That’s why Rome (and modern states) clash with the church: the church becomes an “imperium in imperio” a government within a...

Rushdoony frames modern culture as a return to pagan totalitarianism, using the prosecution of cryptographer Philip Zimmermann as a symbol of the state’s demand for total surveillance and control. Privacy, property, and due process are eroding, while biblical morality is displaced by licentiousness enforced through law and education. He argues that chastity is now treated as illegal “religion,” wh...

Philippians 2:9–11 is presented as a trumpet-blast declaration that Jesus Christ is Lord God incarnate, exalted by the Father, and sovereign over heaven, earth, and all powers. That confession meant Caesar was under Christ, not the other way around. The early church therefore functioned like an embassy of a foreign kingdom within Rome: obedient to civil order where possible, but ultimately governe...

Rushdoony’s central claim is that culture reveals religion, most clearly through law and education. By these measures, modern society is humanistic, having confined faith to private worship while surrendering public life to the state. In antiquity this was normal: the state was the church. Rulers functioned as divine figures, and there was no separation of church and state. As societies abandon Ch...

Rushdoony’s core claim is that law flows from sovereignty: whoever is lord in a society defines its rule of life. When churches deny God’s law through antinomianism, they effectively confess, “We have no king but Caesar.” The early church refused Rome’s demand to say “Caesar is Lord” and instead confessed Christ’s universal lordship (Phil. 2:9–11). They did not seek change through protests but by...

In this wide-ranging Q&A, Rushdoony presses home that modern mental-health theory, medicine, and social policy are increasingly instruments of control rather than healing, whether in Soviet psychiatry, Freudian psychology, or Western technocracy. He contrasts Freud, Jung, and Adler while insisting Freud’s guilt-without-sin framework remains dominant, then applies the same critique to medical e...

Rushdoony argues that the modern world’s inversion of justice celebrating crime while erasing responsibility flows from the legacy of Marx, Darwin, and Freud, who completed the Enlightenment’s turn from God to man and ultimately against man himself. Focusing on Freud, he warns that redefining guilt as a scientific problem rather than a moral one severs guilt from sin, abolishes true accountability...

Rushdoony argues that Christianity’s future depends on remembering and applying past victories, not merely believing abstractly. Early Christians transformed society by practicing a total faith establishing justice, charity, education, and care for the poor so effectively that the church became an “empire within the empire.” When these victories were forgotten, Christianity retreated into private...

Rushdoony’s theme is that forgotten victories become present defeats: the church has lost strength because it remembers Scripture but forgets how earlier Christians applied it. He cites 1 Corinthians 6: churches formed courts of arbitration so just that even pagans sought their rulings making Christianity an “empire within the empire” that Rome resented. He then sketches a long shift from Christia...

Rushdoony argues that Christian reconstruction rests on God’s promise of victory: the meek shall inherit the earth. Scripture consistently teaches that God’s kingdom advances in history, fulfilled in Christ the true lawgiver and judge who inaugurates the new creation through His resurrection. Regenerated believers are therefore called to bring every area of life into obedience to Christ the King....

Rushdoony argues that the book of Acts shows persecution is inevitable wherever Christianity becomes effective. The real issue is always lordship by what power and by what name things are done. The early church was not persecuted for immorality or disorder, but because it manifested God’s power outside state control, making Christ a rival to Caesar. Any ruling order that sees itself as man’s savio...

Rushdoony argues that the future of society rises or falls with the family. Scripture places the family not the church or the state at the center of social power, entrusting it with education, charity, inheritance, property, and the training of children. When these responsibilities shift to the state, freedom declines and statism grows. By contrast, when families reclaim these callings through Chr...

Biblical law places the family at the center of society because God entrusts it with decisive powers: children (the future), property, inheritance, education, and welfare. When these are taken over by the state, society weakens. True renewal comes as families reclaim these responsibilities through Christian education, care for their own, and faithful stewardship. Rushdoony argues that this reclama...

Rushdoony argues that only the Christian family has a future because it alone lives by God’s law rather than statist planning, making the family—not church or state—the primary engine of social renewal through its biblical duties of provision, education, charity, inheritance, discipline, and dominion; drawing from Scripture and history, he insists that neglect of family law hollows out faith, fuel...

Rushdoony contends that biblical law makes the family the primary power-center of society—entrusted by God with children, property, inheritance, education, and welfare—and that modern statism systematically attacks and replaces these jurisdictions by denying creation, order, and harmony in favor of evolutionary conflict and centralized control; he argues that only belief in the sovereign Creator,...

Rushdoony argues that the removal of the Ten Commandments from public schools exposed a basic truth: all law is religious. While the courts rejected biblical law for fear students might obey it, schools freely promote Humanism as a state religion. He says decades of educational “reform” have failed because statist education is built on false premises; pouring in more money only deepens the collaps...

Rushdoony argues that only the Christian family has a future because it alone lives by God’s law rather than statist planning, making the family—not church or state—the primary engine of social renewal through its biblical duties of provision, education, charity, inheritance, discipline, and dominion; drawing from Scripture and history, he insists that neglect of family law hollows out faith, fuel...

Rushdoony, Blumenfeld, and Otto Scott argue that homeschooling works so well because it’s essentially one-on-one tutoring: parents know their children, can hold them accountable, and can move faster without the time-wasting and peer-driven dynamics of institutional schooling. They say homeschoolers tend to become strong readers, good conversationalists, and adult-oriented, while public schools pri...