LessWrong
LessWrong (Curated & Popular)
Audio narrations of LessWrong posts. Includes all curated posts and all posts with 125+ karma. If you'd like more, subscribe to the “Lesswrong (30+ karma)” feed.
Be sure to visit the podcast's website and support the creator: sites.libsyn.com
Where to listen?
Podcasts in the app Replaio Radio Coming soonPodcasts are coming to the app soon. Install now and be the first to see a whole new take on podcasts
Episodes
“How Much Are LLMs Actually Boosting Real-World Programmer Productivity?” by Thane Ruthenis 09.03.2025 7:16
LLM-based coding-assistance tools have been out for ~2 years now. Many developers have been reporting that this is dramatically increasing their productivity, up to 5x'ing/10x'ing it. It seems clear that this multiplier isn't field-wide, at least. There's no corresponding increase in output, after all. This would make sense. If you're doing anything nontrivial (i. e., anyt...
“So how well is Claude playing Pokémon?” by Julian Bradshaw 09.03.2025 9:05
Background: After the release of Claude 3.7 Sonnet,[1] an Anthropic employee started livestreaming Claude trying to play through Pokémon Red. The livestream is still going right now. TL:DR: So, how's it doing? Well, pretty badly. Worse than a 6-year-old would, definitely not PhD-level. Digging in But wait! you say. Didn't Anthropic publish a benchmark showing Claude isn't half-bad a...
“Methods for strong human germline engineering” by TsviBT 07.03.2025 0:18
Note: an audio narration is not available for this article. Please see the original text. The original text contained 169 footnotes which were omitted from this narration. The original text contained 79 images which were described by AI. --- First published: March 3rd, 2025 Source: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/2w6hjptanQ3cDyDw7/methods-for-strong-human-germline-engineering --- Narrated by TYPE...
“Have LLMs Generated Novel Insights?” by abramdemski, Cole Wyeth 06.03.2025 3:49
In a recent post, Cole Wyeth makes a bold claim: . . . there is one crucial test (yes this is a crux) that LLMs have not passed. They have never done anything important. They haven't proven any theorems that anyone cares about. They haven't written anything that anyone will want to read in ten years (or even one year). Despite apparently memorizing more information than any human could e...
“A Bear Case: My Predictions Regarding AI Progress” by Thane Ruthenis 06.03.2025 18:47
This isn't really a "timeline", as such – I don't know the timings – but this is my current, fairly optimistic take on where we're heading. I'm not fully committed to this model yet: I'm still on the lookout for more agents and inference-time scaling later this year. But Deep Research, Claude 3.7, Claude Code, Grok 3, and GPT-4.5 have turned out largely in line w...
“Statistical Challenges with Making Super IQ babies” by Jan Christian Refsgaard 05.03.2025 17:33
This is a critique of How to Make Superbabies on LessWrong. Disclaimer: I am not a geneticist[1], and I've tried to use as little jargon as possible. so I used the word mutation as a stand in for SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism, a common type of genetic variation). Background The Superbabies article has 3 sections, where they show: Why: We should do this, because the effects of editing wi...
“Self-fulfilling misalignment data might be poisoning our AI models” by TurnTrout 04.03.2025 1:51
This is a link post. Your AI's training data might make it more “evil” and more able to circumvent your security, monitoring, and control measures. Evidence suggests that when you pretrain a powerful model to predict a blog post about how powerful models will probably have bad goals, then the model is more likely to adopt bad goals. I discuss ways to test for and mitigate these potential mech...
“Judgements: Merging Prediction & Evidence” by abramdemski 01.03.2025 11:13
I recently wrote about complete feedback, an idea which I think is quite important for AI safety. However, my note was quite brief, explaining the idea only to my closest research-friends. This post aims to bridge one of the inferential gaps to that idea. I also expect that the perspective-shift described here has some value on its own. In classical Bayesianism, prediction and evidence are two dif...
“The Sorry State of AI X-Risk Advocacy, and Thoughts on Doing Better” by Thane Ruthenis 26.02.2025 12:31
First, let me quote my previous ancient post on the topic: Effective Strategies for Changing Public Opinion The titular paper is very relevant here. I'll summarize a few points. The main two forms of intervention are persuasion and framing. Persuasion is, to wit, an attempt to change someone's set of beliefs, either by introducing new ones or by changing existing ones. Framing is a more...
“Power Lies Trembling: a three-book review” by Richard_Ngo 26.02.2025 27:11
In a previous book review I described exclusive nightclubs as the particle colliders of sociology—places where you can reliably observe extreme forces collide. If so, military coups are the supernovae of sociology. They’re huge, rare, sudden events that, if studied carefully, provide deep insight about what lies underneath the veneer of normality around us. That's the conclusion I take away f...
“Emergent Misalignment: Narrow finetuning can produce broadly misaligned LLMs” by Jan Betley, Owain_Evans 26.02.2025 7:58
This is the abstract and introduction of our new paper. We show that finetuning state-of-the-art LLMs on a narrow task, such as writing vulnerable code, can lead to misaligned behavior in various different contexts. We don't fully understand that phenomenon. Authors: Jan Betley*, Daniel Tan*, Niels Warncke*, Anna Sztyber-Betley, Martín Soto, Xuchan Bao, Nathan Labenz, Owain Evans (*Equal Cont...
“The Paris AI Anti-Safety Summit” by Zvi 22.02.2025 42:06
It doesn’t look good. What used to be the AI Safety Summits were perhaps the most promising thing happening towards international coordination for AI Safety. This one was centrally coordination against AI Safety. In November 2023, the UK Bletchley Summit on AI Safety set out to let nations coordinate in the hopes that AI might not kill everyone. China was there, too, and included. The practical fo...
“Eliezer’s Lost Alignment Articles / The Arbital Sequence” by Ruby 20.02.2025 2:37
Note: this is a static copy of this wiki page. We are also publishing it as a post to ensure visibility. Circa 2015-2017, a lot of high quality content was written on Arbital by Eliezer Yudkowsky, Nate Soares, Paul Christiano, and others. Perhaps because the platform didn't take off, most of this content has not been as widely read as warranted by its quality. Fortunately, they have now been...
“Arbital has been imported to LessWrong” by RobertM, jimrandomh, Ben Pace, Ruby 20.02.2025 8:52
Arbital was envisioned as a successor to Wikipedia. The project was discontinued in 2017, but not before many new features had been built and a substantial amount of writing about AI alignment and mathematics had been published on the website. If you've tried using Arbital.com the last few years, you might have noticed that it was on its last legs - no ability to register new accounts or log...
“How to Make Superbabies” by GeneSmith, kman 20.02.2025 1:08:04
We’ve spent the better part of the last two decades unravelling exactly how the human genome works and which specific letter changes in our DNA affect things like diabetes risk or college graduation rates. Our knowledge has advanced to the point where, if we had a safe and reliable means of modifying genes in embryos, we could literally create superbabies. Children that would live multiple decades...
“A computational no-coincidence principle” by Eric Neyman 19.02.2025 13:28
Audio note: this article contains 134 uses of latex notation, so the narration may be difficult to follow. There's a link to the original text in the episode description. In a recent paper in Annals of Mathematics and Philosophy, Fields medalist Timothy Gowers asks why mathematicians sometimes believe that unproved statements are likely to be true. For example, it is unknown whether <span&...
“A History of the Future, 2025-2040” by L Rudolf L 19.02.2025 2:22:38
This is an all-in-one crosspost of a scenario I originally published in three parts on my blog (No Set Gauge). Links to the originals: A History of the Future, 2025-2027 A History of the Future, 2027-2030 A History of the Future, 2030-2040 Thanks to Luke Drago, Duncan McClements, and Theo Horsley for comments on all three parts. 2025-2027 Below is part 1 of an extended scenario describing how the...
“It’s been ten years. I propose HPMOR Anniversary Parties.” by Screwtape 18.02.2025 1:54
On March 14th, 2015, Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality made its final post. Wrap parties were held all across the world to read the ending and talk about the story, in some cases sparking groups that would continue to meet for years. It's been ten years, and think that's a good reason for a round of parties. If you were there a decade ago, maybe gather your friends and talk abo...
“Some articles in ‘International Security’ that I enjoyed” by Buck 16.02.2025 7:56
A friend of mine recently recommended that I read through articles from the journal International Security, in order to learn more about international relations, national security, and political science. I've really enjoyed it so far, and I think it's helped me have a clearer picture of how IR academics think about stuff, especially the core power dynamics that they think shape internati...
“The Failed Strategy of Artificial Intelligence Doomers” by Ben Pace 16.02.2025 8:39
This is the best sociological account of the AI x-risk reduction efforts of the last ~decade that I've seen. I encourage folks to engage with its critique and propose better strategies going forward. Here's the opening ~20% of the post. I encourage reading it all. In recent decades, a growing coalition has emerged to oppose the development of artificial intelligence technology, for fear...
“Murder plots are infohazards” by Chris Monteiro 14.02.2025 3:58
Hi all I've been hanging around the rationalist-sphere for many years now, mostly writing about transhumanism, until things started to change in 2016 after my Wikipedia writing habit shifted from writing up cybercrime topics, through to actively debunking the numerous dark web urban legends. After breaking into what I believe to be the most successful ever fake murder for hire website ever cr...
“Why Did Elon Musk Just Offer to Buy Control of OpenAI for $100 Billion?” by garrison 11.02.2025 11:41
This is the full text of a post from "The Obsolete Newsletter," a Substack that I write about the intersection of capitalism, geopolitics, and artificial intelligence. I’m a freelance journalist and the author of a forthcoming book called Obsolete: Power, Profit, and the Race to build Machine Superintelligence. Consider subscribing to stay up to date with my work. Wow. The Wall Street Jo...
“The ‘Think It Faster’ Exercise” by Raemon 09.02.2025 21:25
Ultimately, I don’t want to solve complex problems via laborious, complex thinking, if we can help it. Ideally, I'd want to basically intuitively follow the right path to the answer quickly, with barely any effort at all. For a few months I've been experimenting with the "How Could I have Thought That Thought Faster?" concept, originally described in a twitter thread by Eliezer...
“So You Want To Make Marginal Progress...” by johnswentworth 08.02.2025 7:10
Once upon a time, in ye olden days of strange names and before google maps, seven friends needed to figure out a driving route from their parking lot in San Francisco (SF) down south to their hotel in Los Angeles (LA). The first friend, Alice, tackled the “central bottleneck” of the problem: she figured out that they probably wanted to take the I-5 highway most of the way (the blue 5's in th...
“What is malevolence? On the nature, measurement, and distribution of dark traits” by David Althaus 08.02.2025 1:20:43
Summary In this post, we explore different ways of understanding and measuring malevolence and explain why individuals with concerning levels of malevolence are common enough, and likely enough to become and remain powerful, that we expect them to influence the trajectory of the long-term future, including by increasing both x-risks and s-risks. For the purposes of this piece, we define malevolenc...
Similar podcasts
Replaio is not a podcast publisher; show names, artwork and audio belong to their authors and are distributed through public RSS feeds.