Do It For The Caselaw
DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries
AI-narrated summaries of individual federal appellate decisions, explained in plain English for working lawyers and legal operators.
Author
Do It For The Caselaw
Category
Podcast website
Latest episode
Jul 10, 2026
Where to listen?
Podcasts in the app Replaio Radio Coming soonPodcasts are coming to the app soon. Install now and be the first to see a whole new take on podcasts
Episodes
Case Explained: ANDREW JOSEPH, JR. as natural father, next friend and personal representative of the Estate of Andrew Joseph III deceased v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SHERIFF 10.07.2026 1:43
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-07-10 Docket: 8:16-cv-00274-MSS-CPT The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment, upholding the jury’s verdict that found the Hillsborough County Sheriff’s Office liable for wrongful death while rejecting the plaintiff’s Fourth Amendment claim against Deputy Mark Clark. The court held...
Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHARLES RAYMOND WABLE 10.07.2026 1:21
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-10 The Fourth Circuit affirmed Charles Raymond Wable’s 180-month prison sentence for unlawful possession of a firearm and witness tampering, rejecting his arguments that the district court erred in calculating his base offense level and abused its discretion by failing to consider nonfrivolous sentencing arguments. R...
Case Explained: Parker v. Bisignano 10.07.2026 1:09
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-10 Docket: 2:24-CV-02533-DDC) The Tenth Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of Michael Eugene Parker, Sr.’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction. The court held that because Mr. Parker failed to seek review by the Social Security Administration’s Appeals Council regarding the Administrative Law Judg...
Case Explained: DMARCIAN, INC. Plaintiff – v. DMARC ADVISOR BV, f/k/a dmarcian Europe BV Defendant – 10.07.2026 1:45
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-10 The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court’s second amended preliminary injunction against DMARC Advisor BV (dBV) and dismissed the remainder of dBV’s appeal regarding correction and contempt orders. Regarding the injunction, the court held that it comports with the Supreme Court’s decision in *Abi...
Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROLEX BRYAN BRUNO 10.07.2026 1:04
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-07-10 Docket: 1:21-cr-20418-JLK-1 The eleventh-circuit vacated the defendant’s conviction for carjacking and remanded the case for a new trial on that count. The court held that the district court committed plain error by delivering an Allen charge that deviated substantially from the circuit’s pattern jury inst...
Case Explained: ANDREW JOSEPH, JR. as natural father, next friend and personal representative of the Estate of Andrew Joseph III deceased v. HILLSBOROUGH COUNTY SHERIFF 10.07.2026 1:38
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-07-10 Docket: 8:16-cv-00274-MSS-CPT The Eleventh Circuit affirmed the district court’s denial of the plaintiff’s renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law and motion for a new trial regarding the Fourth Amendment claim, as well as the district court’s rulings on sovereign immunity, evidentiary admissi...
Case Explained: Ignacio Sosnava Rodriguez Petitioner— v. Sylvester M. Ortega 10.07.2026 0:49
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-10 The Fifth Circuit vacated the panel opinion issued on July 2, 2026, and ordered a rehearing of the consolidated immigration cases en banc with oral argument to be scheduled at a later date. The court’s decision was based on a majority vote of circuit judges in regular active service who were not disqualified, actin...
Case Explained: Ignacio Sosnava Rodriguez Petitioner— v. Sylvester M. Ortega 10.07.2026 0:47
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-10 The Fifth Circuit ordered a rehearing en banc of the consolidated immigration cases involving Ignacio Sosnava Rodriguez, Alejandro Villegas Angel, and Miguel Angel Gomez Alvarado. The court vacated the panel opinion issued on July 2, 2026, pursuant to its own motion and a majority vote of the circuit judges in regular ac...
Case Explained: Ignacio Sosnava Rodriguez Petitioner— v. Sylvester M. Ortega 10.07.2026 0:47
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-10 The Fifth Circuit granted a petition for rehearing en banc on its own motion, vacating the panel opinion issued on July 2, 2026. A majority of the circuit judges in regular active service voted to rehear the consolidated immigration cases involving Ignacio Sosnava Rodriguez, Alejandro Villegas Angel, and Miguel Angel Gom...
Case Explained: JOSHUA WRIGHT as next of kin of J.W., a minor, now deceased v. ANGELA SHUMATE, et al 09.07.2026 1:31
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: 2026-07-09 The Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of Joshua Wright’s § 1983 claim alleging that Illinois Department of Children and Family Services employees violated his deceased son’s substantive due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment by failing to protect him from private viole...
Case Explained: NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY v. BEE QUALITY INC 09.07.2026 1:42
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: 2026-07-09 The Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of judgment on the pleadings in favor of Nautilus Insurance Company, holding that a “Prior Work Exclusion” in Bee Quality Inc.’s commercial general liability policy effectively barred coverage for claims arising from work completed before t...
Case Explained: Tomas Rey; Melisa Rey; Robert K. Denny; Victoria Emmerling; Nicole Williamson Plaintiffs— v. LCMC Health Care Partners, L.L.C.; Louisiana Children’s Medical Center; Children’s Hospital; LCMC Health Holdings, Incorporated Defendants— 09.07.2026 1:09
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-09 The Fifth Circuit dismissed the appeal for lack of appellate jurisdiction because the plaintiffs failed to satisfy the requirements for an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). The court held that while the district court’s partial summary judgment order had the practical effect of refusing a permanent...
Case Explained: THE ESTATE OF JASON THOMSON v. THOMAS BEHN, et al 09.07.2026 1:40
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: 2026-07-09 The Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the police officers and the City of Green Bay on the Estate’s claims alleging excessive force and failure to provide medical care in violation of the Fourth Amendment, as well as a Monell failure-to-train claim. The cour...
Case Explained: United States of America v. Anthony Thomas Lee Baker 09.07.2026 1:34
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-09 The eighth-circuit affirmed the district court’s denial of Anthony Baker’s motion to suppress evidence obtained during a traffic stop. The court applied a mixed standard of review, assessing factual findings for clear error and legal conclusions de novo, affirming unless the denial was unsupported by substan...
Case Explained: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ERIC KENDRICK 09.07.2026 1:13
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: 2026-07-09 The Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court’s denial of Eric Kendrick’s motion to suppress evidence obtained via a pole camera installed on a public utility pole across from his leased auto-repair shop. The court held that the warrantless surveillance did not violate the Fourth Amendment because Kendric...
Case Explained: MACE DAVIS v. CITY OF ELGIN, et al 09.07.2026 1:59
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: 2026-07-09 The seventh-circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment for the defendants in this Fourth Amendment excessive force claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court held that the police officers were entitled to qualified immunity because Mace Davis failed to demonstrate that their use of non-l...
Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 24-3062 09.07.2026 1:20
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: 2026-07-09 The seventh-circuit reversed the district court’s judgment enjoining enforcement of Illinois’s Protect Illinois Communities Act, holding that the state’s bans on AR-15-style rifles and thirty-round rifle magazines are consistent with the nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation under...
Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 24-3063 09.07.2026 1:13
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: 2026-07-09 The seventh-circuit reversed the district court’s judgment enforcing a permanent injunction against the Protect Illinois Communities Act, holding that the state’s bans on AR-15 rifles and thirty-round rifle magazines are consistent with the nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation under the...
Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT LATRIA HARRISON v. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; DOUGLAS A. COLLINS ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 09.07.2026 1:49
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-09 The sixth-circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the Department of Veterans Affairs on Latria Harrison’s claims under the Rehabilitation Act and the Family and Medical Leave Act. The court held that Harrison forfeited her arguments on appeal because her brief merely copied...
Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 24-3061 09.07.2026 1:19
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: 2026-07-09 The seventh-circuit reversed the district court’s judgment enjoining enforcement of the Protect Illinois Communities Act, holding that the Act’s restrictions on AR-15 rifles and thirty-round rifle magazines are consistent with the nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation under the Second Am...
Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 24-3060 09.07.2026 1:26
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: 2026-07-09 The seventh-circuit reversed the district court’s permanent injunction that had enjoined enforcement of the entire Protect Illinois Communities Act, holding that the Act’s restrictions on AR-15 rifles and thirty-round rifle magazines are consistent with the Nation’s historical tradition of firearm reg...
Case Explained: Summary Calendar Hector Mauricio Rivera-Carpio v. Todd Wallace Blanche, Acting U.S. Attorney General 09.07.2026 1:25
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-09 The Fifth Circuit denied the petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ decision affirming the denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). The court held that the agency’s findings were supported by substantial evidence, specifically concl...
Case Explained: 26a0193p.06 09.07.2026 1:42
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-09 The sixth-circuit reversed the district court’s dismissal of Kyle Millis’s federal habeas corpus petition as untimely and remanded the case for further proceedings. The court held that it was not “plainly apparent” from the petition and exhibits that Millis was not entitled to equitable tolling of...
Case Explained: MAXIMINO RAMOS v. TODD BLANCHE, Acting Attorney General —————————— IMMIGRANT DEFENSE PROJECT Amicus Supporting 09.07.2026 1:36
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-09 The Fourth Circuit granted Maximino Ramos’s petition for review, vacated the Board of Immigration Appeals’ final order of removal, and remanded the case to the agency for further proceedings. The court held that Ramos’s conviction under Virginia Code § 18.2-111 does not categorically constitute an R...
Case Explained: Summary Calendar United States of America Plaintiff— v. Ramiro Quevedo-Escobar Defendant— 09.07.2026 0:55
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: 2026-07-09 The Fifth Circuit granted the Government’s motion for summary affirmance and affirmed the district court’s judgment imposing a 36-month sentence on Ramiro Quevedo-Escobar for illegal reentry under 8 U.S.C. § 1326. The court held that the defendant’s argument challenging the constitutionality of the sent...
Similar podcasts
Replaio is not a podcast publisher; show names, artwork and audio belong to their authors and are distributed through public RSS feeds.