Do It For The Caselaw
DIFTCL: Federal Narrative Summaries
AI-narrated summaries of individual federal appellate decisions, explained in plain English for working lawyers and legal operators.
Be sure to visit the podcast's website and support the creator: doitforthecaselaw.com
Author
Do It For The Caselaw
Category
Podcast website
Latest episode
Oct 20, 2026
Where to listen?
Podcasts in the app Replaio Radio Coming soonPodcasts are coming to the app soon. Install now and be the first to see a whole new take on podcasts
Episodes
Case Explained: USA V. MUMMA 20.10.2026 1:44
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 Docket: 1:20-cr-00168- The ninth-circuit affirmed the denial of Todd Mumma’s motion to dismiss his indictment for sexual exploitation of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a), holding that the indictment was sufficient because it tracked the statutory language, included all requisite elements and jurisdiction...
Case Explained: 25-60524 Zahid v. Blanche 20.10.2026 2:05
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The Fifth Circuit denied the petitions for review filed by Hayatullah Zahid, a native of Afghanistan, challenging the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) denial of relief under the Convention Against Torture (CAT), its refusal to remand his case for consideration of new evidence, and its denial of reconsideration....
Case Explained: NATANAEL VINCENTE-PEREZ V. TODD BLANCHE 20.10.2026 1:01
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The Ninth Circuit denied Natanael Vicente-Perez’s petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals decision that dismissed his appeal from an Immigration Judge’s order denying his claims for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). The court applied the substantia...
Case Explained: ALBARRAN JAIMES, ET AL. V. BLANCHE 20.10.2026 1:11
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The Ninth Circuit denied the petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision that affirmed an immigration judge’s order denying asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT). The court applied the substantial evidence standard to factual findings and...
Case Explained: MENNONITE CHURCH USA v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY 20.10.2026 2:14
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The dc-circuit reversed the district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction, holding that the plaintiff religious organizations likely possess associational standing to challenge the Department of Homeland Security’s rescission of its “Sensitive Locations Policy.” The court dete...
Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTONIO DARNEL REED ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 20.10.2026 3:03
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The Sixth Circuit affirmed the district court’s denial of motions to suppress evidence and statements made by Defendant Antonio Reed following his guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute controlled substances. The court applied a clear error standard to factual findings and de novo review to legal concl...
Case Explained: 233RD STREET PARTNERSHIP, L.P. v. US 20.10.2026 1:31
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The Federal Circuit affirmed the Court of Federal Claims’ summary judgment ruling that 233rd Street Partnership, L.P. lacked standing to bring a Fifth Amendment takings claim regarding a rail corridor converted to trail use under the National Trails System Act. The court held that the appellant failed to demonstr...
Case Explained: JBS HAIR INC. v. ITC 20.10.2026 0:37
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The federal-circuit dismissed the appeal from the United States International Trade Commission under Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b) upon agreement by the parties. The court further ordered that each side shall bear its own costs. Do It For The Case Law is a news reporting service. Nothing in this episode con...
Case Explained: United States of America v. Cody Kinzie Dittmar 20.10.2026 1:16
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The eighth-circuit affirmed the district court’s order revoking Cody Dittmar’s supervised release and imposing a 24-month prison sentence. The court held that the district court did not clearly err in finding that Dittmar violated the conditions of his release, applying a clear error standard to the factual...
Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 25-2649 20.10.2026 1:38
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The seventh-circuit affirmed the district court’s adoption of a Special Master’s report determining that previously-escrowed funds belonged to judgment debtor Steven Ivankovich and were subject to post-judgment discovery citations under Illinois law (735 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/2-1402). The court held that the S...
Case Explained: Feldkamp v. University of Kansas Hospital Authority 20.10.2026 1:23
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The seventh-circuit affirmed the district court’s adoption of a Special Master’s report determining that previously-escrowed funds belonged to judgment debtor Steven Ivankovich and were subject to seizure by plaintiffs to satisfy a $4.5 million default judgment. The court dismissed Ivankovich’s appeal...
Case Explained: BRIAN ELKINS and ANNIE ELKINS v. SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA HEALTH MANAGEMENT INC., doing business as COLUMBUS REGIONAL HEALTH 20.10.2026 1:57
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The seventh-circuit affirmed the district courts’ orders remanding four consolidated class action lawsuits against private health care providers back to state court, holding that the defendants did not qualify for federal officer removal under 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1). The court determined that the providers were n...
Case Explained: BRIAN ELKINS and ANNIE ELKINS v. SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA HEALTH MANAGEMENT INC., doing business as COLUMBUS REGIONAL HEALTH 20.10.2026 2:06
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The Seventh Circuit affirmed the district courts’ orders remanding four consolidated cases to state court, holding that private health care providers were not “acting under” a federal officer within the meaning of the federal officer removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1). The court applied the stand...
Case Explained: John Doe v. United States Securities and Exchange Commission 20.10.2026 0:43
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The eighth-circuit denied John Doe’s petition for review of a final order from the Securities and Exchange Commission that denied his whistleblower award application. The court held that substantial evidence supported the Commission’s determination that Doe’s information did not lead to the successful...
Case Explained: BRIAN ELKINS and ANNIE ELKINS v. SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA HEALTH MANAGEMENT INC., doing business as COLUMBUS REGIONAL HEALTH 20.10.2026 1:04
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The seventh-circuit affirmed the district courts’ orders remanding five consolidated class-action lawsuits involving health care providers back to state court, holding that the defendants were not “acting under” a federal officer within the meaning of the federal officer removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1...
Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 25-2561 20.10.2026 1:54
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The seventh-circuit affirmed the district court’s adoption of a Special Master’s findings that previously-escrowed funds belonged to judgment debtor Steven Ivankovich and were subject to post-judgment discovery citations under Illinois law (735 Ill. Comp. Stat. 5/2-1402). The court held that the Special Mas...
Case Explained: United States of America Plaintiff— v. Quanita Sherries Brown Defendant—Appellant consolidated with 20.10.2026 1:40
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The Fifth Circuit affirmed the drug trafficking conspiracy convictions and sentences of Quanita Sherries Brown and Clarence Nero. The court held that sufficient evidence supported the jury’s verdict, applying a highly deferential standard to determine whether any rational trier of fact could find the essential elem...
Case Explained: Summary Calendar Duy Dihn Do Plaintiff— v. Comcast Cable Communications Management, L.L.C Defendant— 20.10.2026 1:18
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Comcast. The court held that the Appellant forfeited his claims because he failed to address the Section 1981 and FMLA claims in his appellate briefing, and he could not revive a Title VII retaliation claim that had been voluntari...
Case Explained: Berenson v. Gottlieb 20.10.2026 2:08
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The Second Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of Alex Berenson’s complaint against federal officials and Pfizer executives alleging a conspiracy to suppress his speech regarding COVID-19 vaccines. The court held that Berenson failed to state a cognizable claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) because h...
Case Explained: BRIAN ELKINS and ANNIE ELKINS v. SOUTHEASTERN INDIANA HEALTH MANAGEMENT INC., doing business as COLUMBUS REGIONAL HEALTH 20.10.2026 1:29
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The seventh-circuit affirmed the district courts’ orders remanding four consolidated cases to state court, holding that private health care providers were not “acting under” a federal officer within the meaning of the federal officer removal statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(1), when they created online pa...
Case Explained: Non-Argument Calendar JULIE HOLLAND an individual v. 3M COMPANY 20.10.2026 2:05
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 Docket: 1:23-cv-00856-TRJ The eleventh-circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of 3M Company, holding that plaintiff Julie Holland failed to establish a prima facie case of religious discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The court applied the standard th...
Case Explained: FinalOpinion in case# 25-2585 20.10.2026 1:24
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The Seventh Circuit affirmed the district court’s adoption of a Special Master’s report concluding that previously escrowed funds belonged to judgment debtor Steven Ivankovich and were subject to enforcement under Illinois citation statutes. The court held that the Special Master correctly applied Illinois...
Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT CLAUDIVIAN GOMES-BATISTA v. TODD BLANCHE, Attorney General ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 20.10.2026 1:28
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The Sixth Circuit denied Claudivian Gomes-Batista’s petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT), and cancellation of removal....
Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DEANGELO SMITH ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO O P I N I O N 20.10.2026 1:31
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The sixth-circuit affirmed Deangelo Smith’s twenty-four-month prison sentence for violating the terms of his supervised release. The court rejected Smith’s argument that the district court committed impermissible double counting by considering his role in a fatal assault on a fellow detainee (the August 31 in...
Case Explained: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TYSHAWN MCCUTCHEN ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 20.10.2026 1:38
Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Filed: 2026-10-20 The Sixth Circuit affirmed the district court’s denial of Tyshawn McCutchen’s motion to dismiss his federal indictment for possessing a firearm as a felon under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The court held that while *United States v. Williams* requires that individuals challenging the statute on Second Amendment gr...
Similar podcasts
Replaio is not a podcast publisher; show names, artwork and audio belong to their authors and are distributed through public RSS feeds.