Cardiology Trials
Cardiology Trials
An exploration of pivotal clinical trials in cardiovascular medicine that have significantly influenced the field. This podcast aligns with our publications on the Cardiology Trial's Substack. cardiologytrials.substack.com
Author
Cardiology Trials
Category
Podcast website
Latest episode
Jun 23, 2026
Where to listen?
Podcasts in the app Replaio Radio Coming soonPodcasts are coming to the app soon. Install now and be the first to see a whole new take on podcasts
Episodes
Review of the SOLVD trials 08.05.2025 14:32
N Engl J Med 1991;325:293-302 N Engl J Med 1992;327:685-691 Cardiology Trial’s Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Background: Systolic heart failure affects millions worldwide and is associated with high mortality and morbidity. If left untreated, the one-year mortality ranges from 15-50%, depending on...
Review of the V-HEFT II trial 06.05.2025 11:26
N Engl J Med 1991; 325:303-10 Background Enalapril was found to be superior to placebo for patients with severe, class IV heart failure in the CONSENSUS trial and the regimen of Hydralazine-Isosorbide dinitrate was found to be superior to Prazosin as well as placebo for stable patients with mild heart failure in the original V-HEFT I trial. No sufficiently powered trials in this space had been per...
Summary and discussion of V-HEFT I and CONSENSUS 02.05.2025 56:31
For full review of the trials, please visit https://cardiologytrials.substack.com/ Get full access to Cardiology Trial’s Substack at cardiologytrials.substack.com/subscribe
Review of the CONSENSUS trial 01.05.2025 11:08
N Engl J Med 1987; 314:1429-35 Background Prior to the publication of this study, digoxin and diuretics were the mainstay of chronic heart failure management. No therapy had yet been shown to reduce mortality or improve heart failure outcomes in patients with severe disease. The results of the V-HEFT trial had been published in the prior year, which demonstrated that the vasodilator combination of...
Review of the V-HEFT I Trial 29.04.2025 12:58
N Engl J Med 1986; 314:1547-52 Background Into the mid-1980’s, digoxin and diuretics were the mainstay of chronic disease management for congestive heart failure. Vasodilator agents were also commonly used based on limited data of their favorable hemodynamic effects. No sufficiently powered trials in this space had been performed to assess whether administration of vasodilators or any other agents...
Review of the CULPRIT-SHOCK Trial 17.04.2025 8:25
N Engl J Med 2017;377:2419-2432 Background: A small fraction of patients with acute myocardial infarction (5-10%) have cardiogenic shock. These patients have a high baseline mortality. Early revascularization had been established as better than initial stabilization with medical therapy. Many patients with cardiogenic shock due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) have multivessel disease. The que...
Summary and discussion of MOSCA-FRAIL and SENIOR-RITA 15.04.2025 41:40
For full review of the trials, please see https://cardiologytrials.substack.com/ Get full access to Cardiology Trial’s Substack at cardiologytrials.substack.com/subscribe
Review of the SENIOR-RITA trial 10.04.2025 10:16
N Engl J Med 2024;391:1673-1684 Background: Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is the most common acute coronary syndrome subtype in adults over 75 years old. However, these patients were underrepresented in landmark NSTEMI trials. Older adults with multiple comorbidities face an increased risk of mortality. While NSTEMI contributes to this risk, they also have competing risks such as...
Review of the MOSCA-FRAIL trial 08.04.2025 8:29
JAMA Intern Med 2023;183:407-415 Background: As we have previously discussed, trials comparing invasive versus conservative management in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) have yielded mixed results. The average age of participants in these studies was in the 60s, and multiple comorbidities were relatively uncommon. However, many NSTEMI patients seen in clinical practic...
Summary and discussion of TACTICS-TIMI 18, RITA 3 and ICTUS 03.04.2025 46:37
For full review of the trials, please visit https://cardiologytrials.substack.com/ Get full access to Cardiology Trial’s Substack at cardiologytrials.substack.com/subscribe
Review of the ICTUS trial 01.04.2025 12:00
N Engl J Med 2005;353:1095-1104 Background: Prior trials on revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation have yielded mixed results. While FRISC II and TACTICS-TIMI 18 demonstrated a significant reduction in myocardial infarction, this benefit was not observed in RITA 3 . None of these trials showed a significant reduction in mortality. Further research...
Review of the RITA 3 trial 27.03.2025 11:06
The Lancet 2002;360:743-751 Background: The TACTICS-TIMI 18 trial showed that an early invasive strategy in beneficial in selected patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). These positive findings contrasted the findings from some earlier studies. Cardiology Trial’s Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consid...
Review of the TACTICS-TIMI 18 trial 13.03.2025 12:46
N Engl J Med 2001;344:1879-1887 Background: Acute coronary syndrome is broadly categorized into unstable angina, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). In unstable angina, there is no rise in cardiac biomarkers, although some challenge this clinical entity in the current era of high sensitivity troponins. In NSTEMI, there is elevation of car...
Summary and discussion of PRAMI, COMPLETE and FULL REVASC 11.03.2025 48:39
For full review of the trials, please visit https://cardiologytrials.substack.com/ Get full access to Cardiology Trial’s Substack at cardiologytrials.substack.com/subscribe
Review of the FULL REVASC trial 06.03.2025 11:36
N Engl J Med 2024;390:1481-1492 Background: In patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), opening the culprit artery improves outcomes. Nearly half of STEMI patients have disease in other coronary arteries. Whether revascularizing these non-culprit arteries improves outcomes remained uncertain. The PRAMI trial showed improvement in outcomes with complete revascularization but was re...
Review of the COMPLETE trial 05.03.2025 9:16
N Engl J Med 2019;381:1411-1421 Background Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) had been clearly established as the standard of care for ST elevation myocardial infarction. Yet many patients taken for PCI have multiple lesions in addition to the culprit. The benefit of routinely treating additional significant lesions has been unclear, with previous smaller trials showing reductions in composi...
Review of the PRAMI Trial 27.02.2025 10:37
N Engl J Med 2013;369:1115-23 Background: The COURAGE trial was published in 2007. It compared up-front PCI to medical therapy alone in patients with stable CAD. Preventive PCI did not reduce the chance of dying or having a heart attack over a median follow up time of 5 years. The results rocked the cardiology world because for years prior to the publication of COURAGE, the standard of care called...
Summary and discussion of TAPAS and TASTE 25.02.2025 26:51
For full review of the trials, please visit https://cardiologytrials.substack.com/ Get full access to Cardiology Trial’s Substack at cardiologytrials.substack.com/subscribe
Summary and discussion of trials of fibrinolysis vs invasive strategy in STEMI 20.02.2025 37:26
For full review of the trials, please visit https://cardiologytrials.substack.com/ Get full access to Cardiology Trial’s Substack at cardiologytrials.substack.com/subscribe
Review of the TASTE trial 18.02.2025 11:35
N Engl J Med 2013;369:1587-1597 N Engl J Med 2014;371:1111-1120 Cardiology Trial’s Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support our work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. Background: In the TAPAS trial, thrombus aspiration in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) improved coronary reperfusion as evident by coronary blush grade and elec...
Summary and discussion of OAT 13.02.2025 30:40
For full review of the trial, please visit https://cardiologytrials.substack.com/ Get full access to Cardiology Trial’s Substack at cardiologytrials.substack.com/subscribe
Review of the TAPAS trial 11.02.2025 12:56
N Engl J Med 2008;358:557-567 Background: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is caused by disruption of an atherosclerotic plaque, leading to intraluminal thrombosis that partially or completely blocks the coronary artery. Opening the blocked artery using percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) restores blood flow and is the standard of therapy for these patients. In many patients...
Review of the STREAM trial 09.02.2025 7:42
N Engl J Med 2013;368:1379-1387 Background In 2013, it had been established that primary PCI for STEMI was the preferred strategy. Yet many patients did not have prompt access to primary-PCI capable hospitals and transfer delays could impact outcomes. The vast majority of patients with STEMI who present to non-PCI facilities do not subsequently get primary PCI within recommended times. Cardiology...
Summary and discussion of FAME and RIVAL 30.01.2025 36:28
For full review of the trials, please visit https://cardiologytrials.substack.com/ Get full access to Cardiology Trial’s Substack at cardiologytrials.substack.com/subscribe
Review of the OAT Trial 29.01.2025 12:38
N Engl J Med 2006;355:2395-407 Am Heart J 2011;161:611-21 Background: Registry data suggests that 10-20% of patients with a STEMI present more than 12 hours after the onset of symptoms. The optimal treatment for such patients is unknown. In some cases, the inciting event may have occurred weeks prior and been mistaken for indigestion or another non-life threatening condition. Such patients may pre...
Similar podcasts
Replaio is not a podcast publisher; show names, artwork and audio belong to their authors and are distributed through public RSS feeds.