Inside Murder Trial

It’s the final episode of this series of Inside Murder Trial – everything could hinge on the closing speeches of the advocates. Can either side present a compelling argument which proves Campbell’s guilt, or provide enough doubt for the jury to find him not guilty? Tommy Ross KC explains the methods behind the speeches, and the options available to the jury. This time - for the first time on Insid...

After nearly two weeks hearing the prosecution case, the jury are now set to hear just a handful of witnesses for the defence. Tommy Ross KC explains the defence don’t need to prove Campbell’s innocence - just raise doubts and point out reasons why the jury might find him innocent. Central to the defence case - David Campbell takes the decision to give evidence - and opens himself to cross examina...

The final witnesses for the prosecution are called to give evidence, but what impact will they have on proceedings? The jury is played extracts from David Campbell’s police interview - where he chooses to answer some questions and not others. And Tommy reflects on Campbell’s decision to go ahead without any legal representation. Later in court, there is drama as the jury is reduced to 14 members....

The partner of the accused is rarely called by the prosecution. But today – we hear evidence from David’s wife of more than 57 years. She’s asked about his relationship with the victim, Brian Low. And she’s quizzed about the CCTV showing a bike similar to hers being ridden through Aberfeldy. Does she agree that the rider could be her husband? Later in the episode we learn how David’s football alle...

After yesterday’s revelations from the CCTV cameras, we follow more images which perhaps show someone on their way to commit the murder. But do any of the camera’s provide a clear shot of who that person is? We also see footage of David Campbell apparently making gestures towards the police – on his own camera system. Later – there is evidence which might explain why David’s wife’s bike has change...

It’s an emotional day in court as Brian’s loved ones recall the moment their world was shattered, as they first learned that Brian was dead. And then – that he had been murdered. Later, we hear evidence from a police officer who gathered CCTV in the case. And we build a picture of what COULD be the killer on his way to commit the murder…only there’s no images which show his face. Then, on another...

The discovery of a body is always a dramatic moment in court. This episode hears from the first on the scene – from neighbours, to paramedics, and police, as Brian Low is found deceased, with his labrador Millie loyally by his side. We’ll hear how Brian’s death was initially thought not to be suspicious – perhaps stemming from a medical episode rather than foul play. And we’ll hear evidence around...

Having already heard about David Campbell’s temper, todays episode moves on to the relationship between him and the victim, Brian Low. The court hears that they were colleagues, who didn’t always see eye-to-eye. And we hear evidence about an incident, more than a decade earlier, which might have cemented ill feeling between them. Later in court – attention turns to an incident in 2023, just three...

When Brian Low was murdered on a quiet country lane in Perthshire, it required an intense police investigation. He had been out walking his dog when he was apparently gunned down. But this isn’t a place where gun crime is common. Murder is almost unheard of. And Brian had few enemies. Over the following months, detectives speak to hundreds of witnesses, take dozens of statements, and gradually pie...

A brand new season of Inside Murder Trial is coming soon. In ‘Death of a Dog Walker’ – Jane MacSorley and Tommy Ross KC lead listeners through the extraordinary trial of David Campbell – a retired gamekeeper accused of shooting dead a former colleague while he was walking his dog in a quiet country lane. But after a three week trial, will a jury find the accused guilty, or not?

After two weeks of evidence, the jury sit down for one last session. Each of the advocates reads a carefully curated closing speech - summarising all the key evidence and reminding the jury of the facts. But who will have the most compelling argument? Will any of the speeches sway jurors one way, or another? With nothing more to be said, the jury step away to deliberate in secret. When they return...

As the trial draws towards a conclusion, the jury are introduced to a science lesson. Can microscopic algae, found in the River Leven, help answer the question of whether any of the accused entered the water? The jury also hears from some police officers involved in the original enquiry, finding out why the accused weren't brought before a court at the time. And as the final witness completes thei...

After seven days of evidence for the prosecution, it's time for the defence to lead the evidence. And they start with testimony from one of the three accused. Can their account convince the jury of their innocence? Or will the cross-examination prove to be damning? Also taking the stand are two witnesses who support the idea that George Graham may be culpable. What value will the jury put on these...

What did the three accused say when they were quizzed by detectives? As the prosecution case comes to a close, we hear extracts form those interviews. We learn how all three insist they had nothing to do with Caroline's death. And hear the observations of the officers tasked with obtaining their account. Then - in a dramatic twist - the prosecution announce that one of the charges in the case is s...

Did the accused really take a walk with Archie in the middle of the night? And did they really come back to the house, and start arguing? Well - this episode hears evidence form a witness who says she SAW them through her window. The only problem - they never mentioned seeing anything at the time. We also hear evidence from another witness who spent time talking to young Archie Wilson. And - we he...

Witnesses can come in all shapes and sizes. But in a murder trial it's rare to hear evidence from the voice of a five-year-old. In this episode, we break down the events from a dramatic day-5 in court, as the jury is told that a five year old boy may have witnesses the murder, and revealed who was responsible. But is he telling the truth? The court also hears from witnesses who may have seen, or h...

The police know that Caroline Glachan made her way to the River Leven on the night she was killed. So todays evidence, in which two people claim to have been with her on that walk, could complete the picture and reveal what exactly happened. But when the witnesses offer very different versions of events, will that throw doubt into the mind of the jury? Tommy Ross KC breaks down the events as he an...

When Caroline Glachan was found murder in August 1996, the police tried to piece together her last movements, working out where she was, and who she was with. In todays' evidence, two witnesses take the stand to explain that they saw Caroline on that night. One, a friend, also makes some alarming claims about one of the accused, while another witness reveals a startling sighting, and the potential...

Day two of the trial centres on evidence from Caroline's best friend, who reveals concerns about one of the three accused. There's also evidence from a witness - potentially someone who heard the attack on Caroline being carried out. And the 999 call, made by the person who found Caroline's body in the River Leven, is played to the court. There are questions about why Caroline's shoes are placed n...

It's day one of a murder trial at Glasgow high Court. Three people stand accused of the 1996 murder of Caroline Glachan, and as the trial begins, a jury starts to learn some of the facts about the case. First to give evidence is Caroline's mother Margaret, who casts her mind back to the last time she saw her daughter, and the tragic circumstances which led her to find out she had been killed. Also...

For 25-years, Caroline Glachan's family had no answers on why she died, or who killed her. Her body was found face down in the River Leven. The 14-year-old schoolgirl had been battered, and left for dead. Now - three people stand accused of the crime. Prosecutors believe they acted together, to kill Caroline. But the trio deny any involvement. This series features unique recordings from inside the...

We hear the closing speeches. Lord Armstrong invites the jury to retire and begin their deliberations. Will they find William MacDowell guilty of murdering his lover and their son?

Defence witness, Dr Gamblin, who was Renee’s GP gives evidence about an encounter outside his practice that has haunted him for over 40 years.

Fresh evidence is presented surrounding a clandestine meeting months before Renee and Andrew disappeared. There is an offer of money for a job that needs doing.

We hear from the accused, 80 year old William MacDowell, about his illicit affair with Renee and how he regularly treated her.