Jonathan Tobin Daily

A federal judge ignored the causes of antisemitism at Harvard and ruled against the Trump administration’s defunding of it. That should not stand.

The career of the retiring Manhattan congressman demonstrates the way partisan Democrats have abandoned support of Israel for leftist applause.

Forget the U.N. statehood charade. A Palestinian Authority that subsidizes terror and a population indoctrinated in Islamist hate ought to be denied entry to the United States.

The DNC could have sent a message of partial support for the Jewish state. Instead, it encouraged the pro-Hamas left and delayed hopes for a comeback.

Blood libels against Israel may reignite campus antisemitism. Administrators who tolerate the targeting of Jews, however, will have to reckon with President Donald Trump.

An ambassador’s broadside aimed at French President Emmanuel Macron is another example of how Trump 2.0 is prioritizing the battle against a rising tide of Jew-hatred.

Even some who say they don’t hate the Jewish state yet rely only on the mainstream media for news think that there must be some truth to the “genocide” blood libel. Challenging it isn’t easy.

They’ve consistently rejected one if it meant living in peace with a Jewish state. Do the idea’s advocates understand that their goal is Israel’s extinction, or do they want that, too?

Unlike the Trump administration’s efforts, those who purport to represent the community are ignoring the issue of DEI-based Jew-hatred, the root cause of the problem.

The anti-Zionist mayoral candidate is getting advice from former President Barack Obama, while a growing number of party leaders are echoing the genocide blood libel.

Canceled because of its director’s crime, the best film made about the “Affair” belatedly arrives in the United States, posing difficult ethical, artistic and political questions.

The death of a terror operative masquerading as a reporter shows how a genocidal movement and its allies camouflage their propaganda machine.

Palestinians cheered the atrocities of Oct. 7, have been complicit in the fate of the hostages and support Israel’s destruction. Do Jews owe them aid?

Those who validate blood libels about Israel’s deliberately starving Palestinians are complicit in the antisemitic attacks on Jews that will happen long after the war ends.

It’s time to pull CAIR’s tax exemption and designate the Muslim Brotherhood as a terrorist organization.

Israel lacks good options in the war against Hamas, but the condemnations of Netanyahu’s choice says more about his critics than about him.

Extremists and antisemites on the far right have united with the left to spread blood libels about the Jewish state. But Trump and most of the GOP are sticking with Jerusalem.

Frustration is mounting over a lost information war. Still, Israelis are right to think that persuading the world to stop believing blood libels circulated by Hamas cannot be their top priority.

Invoking past disasters to promote Jewish guilt about Gaza disgracefully manipulates history and the truth about the war, as well as bolsters those who wish to destroy Israel.

Hamas terrorists are counting on Jewish empathy to let them survive to continue pursuing the genocidal war they began on Oct. 7. Anyone who does their bidding is despicable and dangerous.

As outrages against Jews multiply, the administration’s settlement with Columbia, though far from perfect, demonstrates that Jews are not alone in the United States.

The breakdown of the ceasefire-hostage release talks is a direct result of the growing signs of a Gaza famine manufactured by the terrorists, not the Jewish state.

The Democrats’ “big tent” includes antisemites, some of whom plan to be its leaders. Unlike the GOP’s Israel-haters, they have a realistic chance of achieving their ambitions.

A 1993 attempt to give away the Golan Heights was a close escape for Israel. The unrepentant architect of that fiasco is now supporting Trump’s fantasies regarding Syria.

The IRS gutted the Johnson Amendment, which prohibited religious institutions from endorsing candidates without losing their tax-exempt status. They were doing it anyway.