Attorney RJ Dieken, Loki Esq Law, Montana
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day -- and following the Court's decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Further, there are no advertisements or sponsors. We call it "information sourcing," and we hope that the p...
Não deixe de visitar o site do podcast e apoiar quem o produz: scotuspodcast.com
Autor
Attorney RJ Dieken, Loki Esq Law, Montana
Categoria
Site do podcast
Último episódio
1 de jul de 2026
Onde ouvir?
Podcasts no app Replaio Radio Em breveOs podcasts estão chegando ao app. Instale agora e seja o primeiro a descobrir um jeito totalmente novo de curtir podcasts
Instale grátis
Android 5 mi+ downloads · nota 4,8
iOS em breve
Episódios
Peter v NantKwest (American rule) 11.12.2019 5:24
Send us Fan Mail PTO can not recover attorney fees via §145, because ”all expenses” is not sufficient to overcome the American Rule. Support the show
Rotkiske v Klemm (FDCPA) 11.12.2019 4:13
Send us Fan Mail refusing to read in a time of discovery exception into the FDCPA’s §1692k(d) 1-year statute of limitations. Support the show
Thompson v Hebdon (election contributions) 25.11.2019 9:32
Send us Fan Mail Court isn’t to fond of Alaska’s low political contributions limits. Support the show
Montgomery v Louisiana (2015 Case\equipment check) 19.10.2019 8:53
Send us Fan Mail A case recently argued about in Mathena v. Malvo Uploading to check equipment and upload ability to podcast sources before we start getting new decisions. Support the show
DOC v New York (Citizenship question) 30.06.2019 16:10
Send us Fan Mail In re the census citizenship question. Support the show
Mitchell v Wisconsin (BAC testing while unconscious) 29.06.2019 6:56
Send us Fan Mail It’s legal. Support the show
Rucho v Common cause (partisan gerrymandering) 28.06.2019 12:38
Send us Fan Mail No help from the courts on partisan gerrymandering. Support the show
US v Haymond (5a 6a, right to jury) 28.06.2019 8:06
Send us Fan Mail Support the show
TN wine & spirits v Thomas (21st Amendment / DCC) 27.06.2019 13:03
Send us Fan Mail Under the 21st amendment and the dormant commerce clause, Tennessee’s two-year residency requirement for new alcohol sales licensing is unconstitutional. Support the show
Kisor v Wilkie (Auer deference) 27.06.2019 12:46
Send us Fan Mail Auer and seminole rock stand. Support the show
US v Davis (void for vagueness) 24.06.2019 8:47
Send us Fan Mail Holding ”crime of voilence” to be unconstitutionally vague. Support the show
Dutra v Batterton (Admiralty, unseaworthyness) 24.06.2019 6:03
Send us Fan Mail Punitive damages are not available for unseaworthiness claims. Support the show
Iancu v Brunetti (FUCT TRADEMARK) 24.06.2019 4:36
Send us Fan Mail PTO can not refuse trademarks on grounds that they are ”immoral or scandalous”. Support the show
Food mktg v Argus Leader (FOIA) 24.06.2019 6:48
Send us Fan Mail This info is confidential under part 4 of FOIA exceptions. Support the show
Flowers v Mississippi (Batson) 21.06.2019 7:56
Send us Fan Mail Support the show
Knick v Township of Scott PA (takings) 21.06.2019 9:17
Send us Fan Mail Williamson co. Is overruled Support the show
Rehaif v US (knowingly) 21.06.2019 5:59
Send us Fan Mail ”knowingly” in sec 924(a)(2) means ”knowingly” Support the show
Kaestner Trust v NC 21.06.2019 6:27
Send us Fan Mail NC Can not tax this trust in this instance, based on only state residence. Support the show
Gundy v US (delegation of power) 20.06.2019 11:08
Send us Fan Mail The sex offender registry’s registration of pre act offenders in not an issue of unconstitutional congressional delegation. Support the show
McDonagh v Smith (fabricated evidence) 20.06.2019 7:38
Send us Fan Mail When does the limitations period clock start ticking in re a claim of fabricated evidence. Support the show
PDR v Carlton & Harris (unsolicited advertisement) 20.06.2019 4:46
Send us Fan Mail Remand for consideration of a few things. Support the show
Am Legion v Am Humanist Assoc. (establishment clause) 20.06.2019 20:00
Send us Fan Mail The Bladensburg cross may remain. Support the show
Gamble v US (sep sovereigns doctrine) 17.06.2019 6:32
Send us Fan Mail The separate sovereigns doctrine is not implicated by double jeopardy. Support the show
VA Uranium v Warren (NRC/AEA) 17.06.2019 11:06
Send us Fan Mail A Virginia ban on Uranium mining is upheld. Support the show
Manhattan CAC v Halleck (1a) 17.06.2019 6:17
Send us Fan Mail The Manhattan community access corp, is not a government actor in regards to the 1st amendment right to free speech. Support the show
Podcasts parecidos
Ouça o podcast Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast) no Replaio
Rádio e podcasts em um só app - grátis e sem cadastro. Instale hoje e não perca o lançamento
O Replaio não é o publicador dos podcasts; os nomes dos programas, as capas e o áudio pertencem aos seus autores e são distribuídos por feeds RSS públicos
