Attorney RJ Dieken, Loki Esq Law, Montana
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day -- and following the Court's decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Further, there are no advertisements or sponsors. We call it "information sourcing," and we hope that the p...
Não deixe de visitar o site do podcast e apoiar quem o produz: scotuspodcast.com
Autor
Attorney RJ Dieken, Loki Esq Law, Montana
Categoria
Site do podcast
Último episódio
1 de jul de 2026
Onde ouvir?
Podcasts no app Replaio Radio Em breveOs podcasts estão chegando ao app. Instale agora e seja o primeiro a descobrir um jeito totalmente novo de curtir podcasts
Instale grátis
Android 5 mi+ downloads · nota 4,8
iOS em breve
Episódios
NY Rifle and Pistol v Bruen (2a) 28.06.2022 18:51
Send us Fan Mail Striking down New York’s restrictions on concealed carry licensing. Support the show
Cummimgs v Premier Rehab (Remedies for federally funded programs) 25.06.2022 11:18
Send us Fan Mail Here Emotional distress damages are not allowed. Support the show
Shurtleff v Boston (Free speech v Establishment Clause) 25.06.2022 9:55
Send us Fan Mail Here A flag at city hall is not government speech. Support the show
Dobbs v [Jackson] Women’s Health (Abortion) 25.06.2022 23:11
Send us Fan Mail Roe and Casey are overruled. Support the show
Boechler v IRS (§6330(d)(1) tolling) 25.06.2022 10:00
Send us Fan Mail This particular subsection is toll-able Support the show
Brown v Davenport 05.06.2022 12:03
Send us Fan Mail In this case the AEDPA and Brect must BOTH be followed. Support the show
US v VAELLO MADERO (Territory governance) 05.06.2022 4:54
Send us Fan Mail Support the show
Austin, TX v Reagan National Advertising (1a Free Speech) 31.05.2022 9:01
Send us Fan Mail The requirement to read a sign to determine it’s compliance, by reference to the sign’s location, with a city ordinance banning off premises advertising, does not infringe 1a freedom of speech. Support the show
CASSIRER v. THYSSEN-BORNEMISZA (FSIA — Choice of law) 31.05.2022 8:30
Send us Fan Mail My limited understanding: Sovereign entities sued under FSIA (but without a separate cause of action implicating federal jurisdiction) are subject to the choice of law provision of the courts which would otherwise be the lawsuit’s venue. Eg. Where you would have had to bring the underlying, non-FSIA/non-federal, Lawsuit where you found the law. Support the show
Badgerow v Walters (Arbitration Jurisdiction FAA Look through) 15.05.2022 8:58
Send us Fan Mail Sections 9 and 10 do not contain “look through” provisions Support the show
Thompson v Clark (§1983 Malicious Prosecution) 15.05.2022 6:26
Send us Fan Mail Lawsuit may proceed. Support the show
Ramirez v Collier (RLUIPA) 14.05.2022 15:38
Send us Fan Mail Texas’s rule against pastor laying hands on and praying with a prisoner in his final moments during a state execution is a violation of the religious land use and institutionalized persons act of 2000. Support the show
Houston Community College system v Wilson (1a Free Speech) 14.05.2022 7:40
Send us Fan Mail Free speech not implicated by deliberative body censure. Support the show
WISCONSIN LEGISLATURE v. WISCONSIN ELECTIONS COMM’N (VRA factors) 02.04.2022 15:00
Send us Fan Mail The Wisc Supreme Court did not properly consider the race based changes to the voting map. Support the show
Cameron (Kentucky) v EMW Women’s Health (Appeal procedure) 08.03.2022 10:37
Send us Fan Mail This is not about abortion, it’s about procedure. Support the show
FBI v Fazaga (State Secrets v §1806) 08.03.2022 8:55
Send us Fan Mail State Secrets wins. Support the show
Wooden v US (ACCA “Occasions”) 08.03.2022 8:14
Send us Fan Mail where where one short duration crime ends and another begins nearly simultaneously the crimes are not separate “occasions” for ACCA purposes. Support the show
US v Tsarnaev (Evidence & Jury selection) 08.03.2022 10:02
Send us Fan Mail Support the show
United States v Zubaydah (State Secrets v §1782 discovery) 07.03.2022 8:33
Send us Fan Mail Support the show
UNICOLORS, INC. v. H&M (Copyright Safharbor) 25.02.2022 8:40
Send us Fan Mail §411(a)’s safeharbor protects unknowing errors of law AND fact. Support the show
HUGHES v. NORTHWESTERN UNIV. (ERISA) 25.01.2022 5:25
Send us Fan Mail Support the show
Hemphill v New York (6a Confrontation -- Rules of evidence) 22.01.2022 9:23
Send us Fan Mail The trial court violated the Petitioner’s 6th Amendment right to confront witnesses against him. Support the show
Babcock v Kijakazi (Dual status technician retirement) 15.01.2022 7:24
Send us Fan Mail For purposes here Only Babcock’s National Guard service payments are payments for service “as a member of a uniformed service” not his technicians pay. Support the show
Biden v Missouri (HHS Medicare/Medicaid Vaccine Mandate) 15.01.2022 21:05
Send us Fan Mail The Court stays a stay of a vaccine mandate for Medicare and Medicaid facility employees. Support the show
NIFB v OSHA (Vaccine Mandate) 15.01.2022 19:46
Send us Fan Mail Granting a stay of OSHA’s vaccine mandate. Support the show
Podcasts parecidos
Ouça o podcast Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast) no Replaio
Rádio e podcasts em um só app - grátis e sem cadastro. Instale hoje e não perca o lançamento
O Replaio não é o publicador dos podcasts; os nomes dos programas, as capas e o áudio pertencem aos seus autores e são distribuídos por feeds RSS públicos
