The Scales of Truth

(Another analysis of snippets from the John Abramson appearance on JRE) I've mentioned a lot a main inherent corruption of health care in the United States - that one can have brand-new, "shiny" technology behind new drugs, or for whatever reason, just say with a straight face that their new drug or technology should be approved and should cost MUCH more than existing solutions REGARDLESS of wheth...

Pf-LIE-zer's CEO appears on yahoo finance blah blah blahing in his best "you'll not call me on my inconsistencies" sales pitch disguised as a briefing-like interview about his company's wonderful and infallible products. [10:26 - I misspoke and meant to say an admission happened in July of 2021, but I accidentally said July of 2020] We listen to the audio and then take apart his claims: 1. It clea...

Opposite Ends of the Spectrum at the Supreme Court 1. A Justice Asking an EXCELLENT question - We've been in an 'emergency' for a while - if the body of the people, the Congress, thought mandates were necessary, they've had plenty of time to do it. So why, given that they have that power and have decided not to do it, do you imagine you should overtake the body of the people? (Plus further backgro...

Pulling from my performance side a little*, here is a reading of one of my favorite essays - "Isaiah's Job." Very inspirational and convincing to help you understand that you do not try to measure the good that your own personal mission may be doing. You don't know where and when its influences may manifest. And, just as you can not measure it, do not be discouraged for the want of evidence of its...

Reaction and analysis of another thing John Abramson mentioned on his JRE appearance. How is it that the government, in the strongest possible position - in a position to punish people who have literally cost American lives through fraud that allowed a dangerous product to be sold - end up namby pambying around things, and doing things like keeping the American people from knowing the details of t...

(This is the first of what will be a series of episodes analyzing and emphasizing information John Abramson, a guest on JRE, gave about the medical industry.) In this initial episode, we discuss how companies are allowed to bury basic safety and efficacy data and only have to present a summary, that peer reviewers must generally take their word for.  An I.T. / public sector analogy for this, to em...

He may wait to say it until the end but at least he says it directly.  Unlike some who won't say it unless and until you ask follow-up questions, and even then may try to word-con you. Also... because it is related - the precise way that COULD be considered very solid info, if we only had a professional press, can be turned into mere "rumor," "speculation," and "anecdote." ========================...

Everyone who is not in the practical Pharma Sales industry known as the rabid portions of the medical industry knows that Vitamin D is utterly important. We've talked about it here and on my "sister" podcast - Kimology 411, where Tyson co-hosts, over and over and over. Because that is how important it is.  Yet, this....  Tyson did not know.  A REAL distinction on the limits of natural Vitamin D pr...

- An admission by the highest levels that a "test" can "give" incorrect results for well over ten times what it should be (12 weeks "positive," when 85% to 90% of transmissibility is within five days). And that admission is literally why self-isolation recommendations are only five days. a.k.a., though the "expert" doesn't say it.. the test is bad. What this means, really. What it means we should...

No less than the CDC director admits: 1. The basic diagnostic can be false positive for 12 weeks after infection . Her audio included. Of course she does not and will not say "the test is bad" and she very artificially avoids the term "false positive." But she admits the equivalent - she says the PCR could stay positive for twelve weeks, which she says  is "long after" someone is transmissible. 2....

One Little Demon Emperor appears again as easy fodder for analysts with brains. As an example of alleged "leaders" admitting something that exactly contradicts what they end up doing and recommending. In this case, The Little Demon admitting that a certain "solution" can not even be known to even not do the OPPOSITE of its alleged purpose unless they just happen to detect that bad effect via long-...

"Finally... Christmas... let me enjoy the family and traditions and love, and take a break from all that other... WAIT, WHAT??? WHAT the hell am I seeing? Are you KIDDING me??" In case you didn't know the asylum has taken over, have a peek at this gem of lunacy.  #ChorusLineDoctors #StepfordMDs ================================================= Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at...

For a variety of reasons as "mRNA" made the headlines, I thought the alternative (at least in the U.S.) J&J was the one type that was a more traditional solution. Turns out I was wrong. In essence they introduce the same risk, just in different ways.  ================================================= Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests f...

If in all of recorded sports and recorded history, there was never an outbreak across MOST teams all at once, how is it that suddenly after about 12/10/21, well after flu season has started, it is the case? Because it's not. Junk-in-junk-out. There is either bad detection, or bad categorization, or both. As discussed in detail in previous recent episodes (QROT-27 and -28) among others. But this ep...

A follow-up to QROT-020 ("We Heroically Stopped a Fake Crime We Started! Goes the Broken Record").   In that episode, I gave the background of admitted operations paid by our money to ensnare stooges, in fake plots created from whole cloth by the authorities, to imprison them as terrorists, just so the authorities can gain a perception advantage and pat themselves on the back. That clear and obvio...

"The solution is failing against the current threat." Umm... you know why? Because you specifically designed it so that it wouldn't be broad enough for a threat you knew would CHANGE . You could have. It would have been easy. BUUUUT you didn't. The word is not "failure." It is that your solution does not even apply . You designed it knowing that it would NOT apply to most of the future problems. I...

Logic string, and then the related high-level cites, for those not as versed, and didn't want to take my word for what I said in TSOT021. Logic String: l. Covid-19 is associated with cardiovascular damage. 2. The reason covid-19 is associated with cardiovascular damage is the spike protein. 3. mRNA has the body create spike protein. 4. Vaccine damage includes cardiovascular damage. Easiest implica...

Scientific research says " problem causes bad effects A, B, & C ." Later, scientific research says " solution causes bad effects A, B, & C ." Literally the solution is admitted to cause the same bad effects of the problem. Yet, now, we are told: " Mysterious 'disorder' follows close in time with 'solution' and causes bad effects A, B, & C." A, B, & C is admittedly caused by the "pr...

NBA teams suddenly, after ALL this time since this reaction exercise started, let alone all of reality since the beginning of time, suddenly having 1/2 to 2/3 of their players on safety and health protocol. Is that consistent with all of reality as you've known it previously? Answer - no.  So that means something else is going on.  Turns out the thread is exactly what we've covered here recently. ...

Literally the (non)-logic for calling something "the latest variant" (Omicron) is to see how it does NOT match the existing test, and if it MISmatches in a certain WAY, then they ASSUME it is exactly and only one variant!! That is, a MISMATCH, plus a giant, non-scientific, assumption is how the latest variant is "identified." Not only that, the MISMATCH is for the SPIKE PROTEIN section! "If the te...

Another case example of why watching broadcast "news" is really just watching programming.  news PROGRAMMING. You cannot count on them even addressing elephant in the room questions. Literally they fall at this point purely to bare assertions. Literally, their modus operandi now is "if you repeat a lie often enough . . . ."  You will be more informed watching a blank wall, because a blank wall wil...

My quickest quick rant.  Problem-reaction-solution? How about problem-reaction-problem, through a "solution" that mimics the problem! Two Plus Two Equals Five, and they get to "fix" you by giving you the VERY threat that they're "trying to prevent." #SpykeProteeensARETheProblemSoHaveTheSpiekeProteeinContainingSolutionMULTIPLETYMES ================================================= Thanks for listen...

Reporting on information given by an official expert, a cardiologist, whose brain is NOT up his rear end regarding the current situation.  1. Persistence in the human body, of the worst part of the "problem," that "science" then made the ONLY part of "the solution." 2.  Something even my highly-suspicious mind did not even SUSPECT about the "booster." It's the exact same formulation as the first t...

Neglected to mention this in main episode.  In the main episode there is a basis for a religious exemption for anyone. But here is a spot-on exemption for those that are pro-life.  ================================================= Thanks for listening! Please feel free to email me at tysonharley1776@duck.com with requests for appearances, thoughts, feedback, questions, observations, or show ideas!...

What someone who voluntarily puts his life and limbs at risk to protect and save and rescue his community's people and property thinks about someone else imagining they get to evaluate his personal risk of a 20-month old illness and an untested "solution." Plus analysis, including: Reward/risk of "problem" versus reward/risk of alleged "solution," is what informs the individual decisions, and for...