The Quill & Sword

In this narrow case, the CAAF looks at whether an adjudged reprimand was appropriate as written as part of its sentence appropriateness review under Article 66(d)(1), Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ). Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School on Facebook (tjaglcs), LinkedIn (tjaglcs), or visit our website for more resources at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/leapp You can a...

Major Josh Mikkelsen, resident Sexual Assault Prevention and Response (SAPR) expert at The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School, shares with us what he considers to be the most significant SAPR updates in the last few years. This is an important episode for commanders and judge advocates advising commanders on SAPR issues. Here are some resources shared during the episode: Army Safe-to...

This Quill and Sword episode features a previously aired NSL Unscripted episode where MAJ M. Keoni Medici interviews COL Pete Hayden (Staff Judge Advocate, U.S. Cyber Command) on pursuing assignments as a judge advocate in national security law (NSL). This episode is the second episode in a three-part series. Check out the third part of this series on NSL Unscripted.

Judge advocates stayed “over there” well past the WWI armistice. What were they doing? Find out on this episode of Fred Talks.

In this case, we explore the sentence appropriateness power of the CCAs. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School on Facebook (tjaglcs), LinkedIn (tjaglcs), or visit our website for more resources at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/leapp You can also connect directly with the Criminal Law Department on Facebook (tjaglcs_crimlaw) or Instagram (tjaglcs_crimlaw)

CLAMO hosts CSM Scott Beeson, U.S. Army Center for Initial Military Training. CSM Beeson reflects on his career, shares leadership lessons from the Battle of Wanat, and discusses implementing Holistic Health and Fitness (H2F).

To quote Chief Judge Ohlson directly “This case underscores the need for everyone involved in a court-martial to pay meticulous attention to the panel member selection process.” Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School on Facebook (tjaglcs), LinkedIn (tjaglcs), or visit our website for more resources at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/leapp You can also connect directly with the...

Mr. Fred Borch and Dr. Victoria Barnett discuss Yom HaShoah, legal implications, and anti-Semitic trends along the timeline that led to the “final solution”. Dr. Barnett is the Frank Talbott, Jr. Endowed Visiting Professor at the University of Virginia.

Over there! That’s right, Judge Advocates went “over there” not just to France, but also to Russia. On this episode Mr. Borch reveals what the American Expeditionary Force’s judge advocates were doing in Vladivostok and Archangel.

This case addresses the application of MRE 412 (prohibition of evidence of sexual behavior or disposition of a victim), but also may be seen as an explora-tion into the Abuse of Discretion standard that appellate courts apply to trial judge’s rulings on evidence. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School on Face-book (tjaglcs), LinkedIn (tjaglcs), or visit our website for m...

CLAMO hosts COL Reese and MAJ Young from the Joint Multinational Readiness Center to discuss commanders’ relationships with their judge advocate and legal team.

CLAMO hosts COL Reese and MAJ Young from the Joint Multinational Readiness Center to discuss commanders’ relationships with their judge advocate and legal team.

This Art. 62 appeal reviews a military judge’s suppression of evidence found on the accused’s phone. Connect with The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School on Face-book (tjaglcs), LinkedIn (tjaglcs), or visit our website for more resources at https://tjaglcs.army.mil/leapp You can also connect directly with the Criminal Law Department on Facebook (tjaglcs_crimlaw) or Instagram (tjaglcs_...

This case is about remote live testimony of a child and the accused’s right to confrontation. Connect with us on Facebook (tjaglcs_crimlaw) or Instagram (tjaglcs_crimlaw)

Over there! That’s right, Judge Advocates went “over there” with the AEF. In this episode of Fred Talks, Mr. Borch address criminal jurisdiction, General Pershing’s military justice priorities, and judge advocates’ roles.

In this case, the CAAF explores the use of an accused’s testimony from a prior trial under Military Rule of Evidence (M.R.E.) 801(d)(2) as an admission by a party opponent. Connect with us on Facebook (tjaglcs_crimlaw) or Instagram (tjaglcs_crimlaw)

It’s Tax Season! MAJ Ceara Riggs and MAJ Kyle Burgamy clarify state residency requirements for Service members and spouses that may help reduce their tax burden.

CLAMO speaks with Professors Jack Beard and Michelle Hanlon about the cur-rent state of space law and resources judge advocates need to know about.

CLAMO speaks with Professors Jack Beard and Michelle Hanlon about the current state of space law and resources judge advocates need to know about.

This case is about whether attempted conspiracy is a viable offense under the UCMJ. We also discuss the concept of waiver. Connect with us on Facebook (tjaglcs_crimlaw) or Instagram (tjaglcs_crimlaw)

This is the second episode of Season 3 of FredTalks! Mr. Borch explains how the JAG Department grew from only 17 uniformed lawyers in 1917 to over 400 personnel during the Great War. Listeners can find a PDF copy of the book by going to: https://tile.loc.gov/storage-services/service/ll/llmlp/JudgeAdvocates-in-GreatWar_1917-1922/JudgeAdvocates-in-GreatWar_1917-1922.pdf

In this inaugural episode of the NSL Unscripted podcast, LTC Laura West, Chair of the National Security Law Department at The Judge Advocate General’s Legal Center and School, interviews two esteemed military national security law practitioners: COL Pete Hayden, Staff Judge Advocate, U.S. Cyber Command, and COL Eric Widmar, Staff Judge Advocate, U.S. Central Command. COL Hayden and COL Widmar shar...

The Center for Law and Military Operations (CLAMO) hosted the Domestic Operations Law short course 23-27 January at TJAGLCS. Maj. Jayne Thompson presented a class on Canadian Domestic Operations Law and joins us on this episode.

This case is about whether the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals (AFCCA) erred in conducting their factual sufficiency review. Appellant alleges they required him to prove his mistake of fact defense with “direct evidence.” Connect with us on Facebook (tjaglcs_crimlaw) Connect with us on Instagram (tjaglcs_crimlaw)

This case is about whether the appellant voluntarily gave his cell phone pass-word to criminal investigators.