The Case for Life

Moral Relativism, the belief that right and wrong are up to our society is not neutral. it is a view of right and wrong that is every bit as much a claim to know something as those who say right and wrong are real.

When you ground human equality in psychological traits, horrific consequences ensue.

If you only argument against the pro-life view is to dismiss it as religious you've not done your homework. You need to work a little harder.

The question of who we ought to save is distinct from the question of who we get to intentionally kill.

We should never assume that our kids have a biblically grounded worldview. They have to catch it, not simply assume it.

Do not under any circumstances let someone badger you into believing they have refuted your argument when all they’ve done is call you a name or otherwise ridicule you.

We should preach the gospel, care for people around us, and love our neighbors, but we should never be told that we’re not pro-life unless we fix everything.

The Alabama State Supreme Court ruling has national implications but also has an impact on how Christians should think about assisted reproductive technologies.

Pro lifers who act prudently given the real fallen world they are forced to work in are not compromising. Those who reject our principles are.

Pro-life advocacy demands that we testify to the truth even if everyone in our culture hates us for it.

Pro-life advocates must be careful not to compromise their principles when they work to save as many children as they can. Here’s a link to Jason’s speech: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=haKxTJVLN8w

Acting to save one life instead of letting two humans die is sometimes the greatest moral good we can achieve.

Far from alienating people visual pictures of abortion actually draw people in to consider our arguments for the humanity of the unborn One of the best defenses of using visual aids is found in this short video:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FPlqfJTXW3c To connect with Christen Polo visit: https://www.protectlifemi.org

Abortion images convey truth in ways that words never can, and pro-lifers are foolish not to use them.

Do the alleged dangers of illegal abortion, justify, intentionally killing an innocent human being?

What a church might do on a Sunday in January to faithfully remain committed to preaching the whole counsel of God and yet be a faithful testament to the issue of abortion and make sure the listeners understand the Biblical view.

When our critics talk about the right to life, they often confuse positive rights with natural rights.

It is one thing to protect as many children as you can when you don’t have the votes to save all children, it’s quite another thing to say as a matter of principle that we will only protect some.

Wokeness attacks the Biblical view of knowledge of human value and what it means to be an image bearer. Pro-life Christians must know how to engage that false worldview or run the risk of being misunderstood. Interview with Dr. Douglas Groothuis | https://www.douglasgroothuis.com

There are legal and moral reasons why the penalty for the mother should be less harsh than the abortionist.

The fact that the unborn human depends on its mother for survival is not a principled reason for saying we can kill him.

Despite what critics say, a simple change in location from inside the womb to outside the womb doesn’t change your essential nature.

It’s time to get over the hype. Pro-lifers are not winning, we are losing and we will continue to lose unless we face some hard truths.

Your level of development does not determine your value as a human being. If you disagree, you will inevitably buy into a standard that makes human equality impossible.

In order to make the most of our time there, we would love to know if you have connections with additional people that we can invite to our trainings in Kathmandu.