Attorney RJ Dieken, Loki Esq Law, Montana
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day -- and following the Court's decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Further, there are no advertisements or sponsors. We call it "information sourcing," and we hope that the p...
Author
Attorney RJ Dieken, Loki Esq Law, Montana
Category
Podcast website
Latest episode
Jul 1, 2026
Where to listen?
Podcasts in the app Replaio Radio Coming soonPodcasts are coming to the app soon. Install now and be the first to see a whole new take on podcasts
Install for free
Android 5M+ downloads · 4.8 rating
iOS soon
Episodes
Va House v Bethune-Hill (Standing) 17.06.2019 7:11
Send us Fan Mail The house is denied standing. Support the show
Quarles v US (Burglaries & the ACA) 12.06.2019 5:18
Send us Fan Mail Quarles’ burglary conviction counts under the Armed Career Criminal act. Support the show
Return Mail v US Postal Service (Patent and who is a person) 11.06.2019 9:23
Send us Fan Mail In this context, Agents of the sovereign (federal agencies) are not “persons” in this section of the AIA. Support the show
Parker Drilling v Newton 10.06.2019 9:18
Send us Fan Mail CA Law needs to fill a gap in federal law to be applicable on the outer continental shelf, under the OCSLA, it can not simply be “not inconsistent”. Support the show
Taggart v Lorenzen (Bankruptcies and Civil Contempt) 04.06.2019 4:49
Send us Fan Mail Vacate and remand, contempt findings in this context require “no fair ground of doubt”. Support the show
Azar v Allina health (Medicare “fraction”) 04.06.2019 7:31
Send us Fan Mail In re notice and comment when changing substanitive rules. Support the show
Ft Bend, TX v Davis (EEOC) 04.06.2019 5:36
Send us Fan Mail About claim filing rules. Support the show
Mont v US (supervised release tolling) 03.06.2019 7:19
Send us Fan Mail Prisoner does not get credit for his pre trial custody in re his supervised release for another crime. Support the show
Smith v Berryhill (SSA Appeals) 31.05.2019 8:43
Send us Fan Mail Definition of “final decision” Support the show
Home depot v Jackson (who can remove to federal court) 31.05.2019 5:09
Send us Fan Mail Third party counterclaim defendants can not remove to federal court. Support the show
Box v Planned Parenthood (Fetal Disposition law) 29.05.2019 5:43
Send us Fan Mail Explicitly stated not to be case about the right to an abortion, although i’m sure the news media will tell you so. Still have a bit of a sore throat, so apologies on some audible swallowing noises etc. Support the show
Nieves v Bartlett (Retaliatory arrest) 28.05.2019 8:46
Send us Fan Mail Retaliatory arrest claim defeated by probable cause to arrest. Support the show
Merck & Dohme v Albrecht (Duty to warn/impossibly doctrine) 21.05.2019 7:51
Send us Fan Mail A clarification on what is considered clear evidence that a drug company could not fulfill it’s duty to warn in light of FDA refusals to allow label changes. Support the show
Mission v Tempnology (contracts in bankruptcy) 20.05.2019 6:15
Send us Fan Mail Breach of a contract under the bankruptcy code still constitutes breach of a contract in this instance. Support the show
Herrera v WY (Treaty hunting rights) 20.05.2019 8:12
Send us Fan Mail Bighorn national forest is not “occupied lands” in the context of an 1865 treaty. Said treaty did not expire upon Wyoming's statehood. Support the show
Cochise v US ex. Rel. Hunt (Relator statute of limitations) 14.05.2019 7:15
Send us Fan Mail Regarding relators filing qui tam and when is too late. Support the show
Apple v Pepper (Anti Trust/Monopoly) 13.05.2019 6:30
Send us Fan Mail Consumers may sue apple for allegedly monopolizing app sales. Support the show
Tax Board of CA v Hyatt 13.05.2019 7:53
Send us Fan Mail Nevada v Hall is overruled. Support the show
Thacker v TVA (TVA Specific) 29.04.2019 5:21
Send us Fan Mail The Tennessee Valley Authority is not completely immune from suit, but there may be other exceptions. Support the show
Lamps plus v Varela (forced class arbitration) 24.04.2019 6:55
Send us Fan Mail Courts may not use ambiguous wording about consent to class arbitration to force class arbitration even over the idea of contra proferentem. Support the show
Bestek v Berryhill (unsupported expert testimony) 01.04.2019 5:18
Send us Fan Mail Fyi Scintilla means - a tiny trace or spark of a specified quality or feeling. Court declines to create a categorical rule making expert testimony given without REQUESTED supporting documentation invalid in ALJ hearings. Support the show
Bucklew v Precythe (Death Penalty) 01.04.2019 8:01
Send us Fan Mail Bucklew (prisoner) looses this challenge. Support the show
Lorenzo v SEC (securities fraud) 27.03.2019 8:18
Send us Fan Mail Lorenzo can be charged under 10b-5 (a) and (c) even if he does not meet the qualifications to be charged under subsection (b) - as understood through the lens of Janus v SEC. Support the show
Sudan v Harrison 26.03.2019 7:13
Send us Fan Mail Service to a foreign state’s minister of foreign affairs, under FISA can not be to the embassy in the US. Support the show
Sturgeon v Frost (Alaska Hovercraft) 26.03.2019 10:44
Send us Fan Mail The alaska hovercraft case (again). ANILCA doesn’t give the park service authority over navigible waters. Support the show
Similar podcasts
Listen to the Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast) podcast in Replaio
Radio and podcasts in one app - free, with no sign-up. Install today and do not miss the launch
Replaio is not a podcast publisher; show names, artwork and audio belong to their authors and are distributed through public RSS feeds.
