Attorney RJ Dieken, Loki Esq Law, Montana
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day -- and following the Court's decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Further, there are no advertisements or sponsors. We call it "information sourcing," and we hope that the p...
Author
Attorney RJ Dieken, Loki Esq Law, Montana
Category
Podcast website
Latest episode
Jul 1, 2026
Where to listen?
Podcasts in the app Replaio Radio Coming soonPodcasts are coming to the app soon. Install now and be the first to see a whole new take on podcasts
Episodes
CHIAFALO v. WASHINGTON (Faithless Electors) 07.07.2020 7:17
Send us Fan Mail Also Colorado Department of State v Baca Support the show
PTO v Booking.com (Trademark) 03.07.2020 5:17
Send us Fan Mail Booking.com is not a generic name. Support the show
ESPINOZA v. MONTANA DEPT. OF REVENUE (Freedom of religion) 03.07.2020 6:32
Send us Fan Mail Can’t discriminate solely on the basis of religious affiliation (distinguishing religious conduct as different). Support the show
AGENCY FOR INT’L DEVELOPMENT v. ALLIANCE FOR OPEN SOCIETY INT’L 01.07.2020 4:26
Send us Fan Mail First Amendment argument fails. Support the show
SEILA LAW LLC v. CFPB 01.07.2020 13:20
Send us Fan Mail The appointment and removal provisions for the director of the CFPB is unconstitutional, but this stuff is severable from the dodd frank act. Support the show
JUNE MEDICAL SERVICES v. RUSSO (Abortion) 29.06.2020 11:35
Send us Fan Mail A Louisiana law requiring admitting privileges at nearby hospitals for abortion doctors is unconstitutional. Support the show
DHS v. THURAISSIGIAM 27.06.2020 8:11
Send us Fan Mail Habius is not useful in requesting asylum determination review, just for release from custody. Support the show
Liu v SEC (Disgorgement in SEC Equity) 22.06.2020 8:02
Send us Fan Mail Some stuff about equitable principles. Support the show
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY v. REGENTS OF UNIV. OF CA (DACA) 19.06.2020 14:39
Send us Fan Mail DACA can not be rescinded without further/better explanation by the DHS. Support the show
US FOREST SERVICE v. COWPASTURE RIVER PRESERVATION (Pipeline under Appalachian trail) 16.06.2020 7:35
Send us Fan Mail Supreme court considers the disputed land an easement to the National park service, thus in this case the pipeline permit is ok. Support the show
Bostock v Clayton Co (Title VII -Transgender/Gay) 15.06.2020 11:51
Send us Fan Mail Title VII of the civil rights act makes it illegal to discriminate in employment against people for being gay, or transgender. Support the show
LOMAX v. ORTIZ-MARQUEZ (PLRA Strikes) 08.06.2020 4:34
Send us Fan Mail In regards to the Prison litigation reform act §1915(g)’s 3 strikes rule, qualifying dismissals count as strikes regardless as to if they are dismissed with or without prejudice. Support the show
BANISTER v. DAVIS - Rule 59(e) petitions 02.06.2020 8:33
Send us Fan Mail Support the show
THOLE v. U. S. BANK (Standing) 02.06.2020 4:30
Send us Fan Mail Plaintiffs in defined benefits retirement plans who suffer no injury in fact, do not have standing to sue. Support the show
NASRALLAH v. BARR (CAT Removal appeals - Immigration) 02.06.2020 7:11
Send us Fan Mail Appealing CAT orders is allowed in this case. Support the show
GE ENERGY POWER CONVERSION FRANCE v. OUTOKUMPU STAINLESS 02.06.2020 8:04
Send us Fan Mail Support the show
FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BD. FOR PUERTO RICO v. AURELIUS INVESTMENT, 02.06.2020 9:32
Send us Fan Mail The board can stay, they are primarily considered to be local officers, not federal officers. Support the show
OPATI v. REPUBLIC OF SUDAN 18.05.2020 5:54
Send us Fan Mail Can sue for punitive damages in this case. Support the show
LUCKY BRAND DUNGAREES v MARCEL FASHIONS (Issue/claim preclusion) 15.05.2020 5:38
Send us Fan Mail This issue is not similar enough to qualify for defensive issue or claim preclusion. Support the show
KELLY v. UNITED STATES (Bridgegate) 08.05.2020 4:57
Send us Fan Mail Regarding the wore fraud charges not being appropriate. Support the show
US v SINENENG-SMITH (Party Presentation rule) 08.05.2020 4:54
Send us Fan Mail 9th Circuit can not make this case about something that the parties had not already presented. Support the show
NY STATE RIFLE & PISTOL v. CITY OF NEW YORK 27.04.2020 3:36
Send us Fan Mail Vacated and remanded for further proceedings. Mostly Moot/can’t assert a new clam here. Support the show
Georgia v Public.Resource.org 27.04.2020 8:29
Send us Fan Mail The annotations are not copyrightable. Support the show
MAINE COMMUNITY HEALTH OPTIONS v. UNITED STATES (Risk Corridors) 27.04.2020 9:48
Send us Fan Mail The government obligated itself to pay in this instance. (Health insurance risk corridors) Support the show
BARTON v BARR (Stop Time cancellation of removal) 25.04.2020 8:18
Send us Fan Mail Support the show
Similar podcasts
Replaio is not a podcast publisher; show names, artwork and audio belong to their authors and are distributed through public RSS feeds.