Attorney RJ Dieken, Loki Esq Law, Montana
Supreme Court Decision Syllabus (SCOTUS Podcast)
Following what the Supreme Court is actually doing can be daunting. Reporting on the subject is often only done within the context of political narratives of the day -- and following the Court's decisions and reading every new case can be a non-starter. The purpose of this Podcast is to make it as easy as possible for members of the public to source information about what is happening at the Supreme Court. For that reason, we read every Opinion Syllabus without any commentary whatsoever. Further, there are no advertisements or sponsors. We call it "information sourcing," and we hope that the p...
Author
Attorney RJ Dieken, Loki Esq Law, Montana
Category
Podcast website
Latest episode
Jul 1, 2026
Where to listen?
Podcasts in the app Replaio Radio Coming soonPodcasts are coming to the app soon. Install now and be the first to see a whole new take on podcasts
Episodes
WHOLE WOMAN’S HEALTH v. JACKSON 10.12.2021 13:12
Send us Fan Mail Petitioners may pursue a pre enforcement challenge against certain of the named defendants, but not others (rejecting some on standing, and some on sovereign immunity). Support the show
MISSISSIPPI v. TENNESSEE (Water) 23.11.2021 8:07
Send us Fan Mail equitable apportionment and multi state Aquifers Support the show
CITY OF TAHLEQUAH v. BOND (Qualified Immunity) 23.10.2021 10:15
Send us Fan Mail Here, officers are entitled to QI. Support the show
RIVAS-VILLEGAS v. CORTESLUNA (Qualified Immunity). 23.10.2021 13:09
Send us Fan Mail This case grants Officer Rivas-Villegas QI. Support the show
AL ASSN. OF REALTORS v. DHHS (Eviction moratorium) 27.08.2021 18:19
Send us Fan Mail The lower court ruled the department of health and human services lacked the authority to continue the eviction moratorium after Congress did not extend it. The lower court, however, stayed enforcement of that order, The Supreme Court, in this case, lifted the stay which ends the eviction moratorium. Support the show
Americans for Prosperity v Bonta (1st Amendment) 03.07.2021 11:21
Send us Fan Mail https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-251_p86b.pdf Support the show
Brnovich v. DNC (VRA) 03.07.2021 18:12
Send us Fan Mail Support the show
Johnson v Guzman Chavez (Immigration) 03.07.2021 10:17
Send us Fan Mail https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-897_c07d.pdf Support the show
MINERVA v. HOLOGIC (assignor estoppel) 03.07.2021 11:08
Send us Fan Mail https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-440_9ol1.pdf Support the show
PENNEAST PIPELINE CO. v. New Jersey (Eminent domain against states) 01.07.2021 15:06
Send us Fan Mail Support the show
Pakdel v San Francisco 30.06.2021 13:42
Send us Fan Mail https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20-1212_3204.pdf Support the show
Lombardo v St. Louis (Police use of force) 28.06.2021 7:10
Send us Fan Mail The issue was improperly considered below. Support the show
HollyFrontier v Renewable Fuels Assoc. (biofuel blending requirements) 28.06.2021 9:38
Send us Fan Mail Support the show
Transunion v Ramirez (Standing) 28.06.2021 10:08
Send us Fan Mail Article III Standing. Support the show
Yellen v Chehalis (ANCs) 28.06.2021 7:09
Send us Fan Mail ANCs are tribes in regards to the CARES Act. Support the show
COLLINS v. YELLEN (FHFA/ appointments) 24.06.2021 18:53
Send us Fan Mail Support the show
LANGE v. CALIFORNIA (4a-Fleeing Misdemeanant) 24.06.2021 7:09
Send us Fan Mail Support the show
Mahanoy v BL (Student free speech) 24.06.2021 6:33
Send us Fan Mail Support the show
NCAA v Alston (Athlete compensation) 22.06.2021 10:20
Send us Fan Mail Support the show
GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. v. ARKANSAS TEACHER RETIREMENT SYSTEM 22.06.2021 8:02
Send us Fan Mail Support the show
UNITED STATES v. ARTHREX (appointments clause/APJs/PTO) 22.06.2021 11:20
Send us Fan Mail Support the show
CALIFORNIA v. TEXAS (ACA) 18.06.2021 9:14
Send us Fan Mail Affordable Care Act is upheld. Support the show
FULTON v. PHILADELPHIA (Free Exercise) 18.06.2021 10:03
Send us Fan Mail Held: The refusal of Philadelphia to contract with CSS for the provision of foster care services unless CSS agrees to certify same-sex couples as foster parents violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amend- ment. -CJ Roberts Support the show
NESTLE USA v. DOE (ATS) 18.06.2021 4:58
Send us Fan Mail Support the show
Terry v U.S. (Fair sentencing act limits) 15.06.2021 5:16
Send us Fan Mail Support the show
Similar podcasts
Replaio is not a podcast publisher; show names, artwork and audio belong to their authors and are distributed through public RSS feeds.