Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

Patent Bar Review

Author

Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006

Category

Education

Latest episode

Jun 30, 2026

Where to listen?

Podcasts in the app Replaio Radio Coming soon

Podcasts are coming to the app soon. Install now and be the first to see a whole new take on podcasts

Get it on Google Play Install for free Android 5M+ downloads · 4.8 rating iOS soon

Episodes

MPEP Q & A 282: Continued prosecution application practice for utility and plant applications 15.08.2023

Question: Since CPA applications were eliminated for utility and plant applications, what should applicants who wish to continue examination of the same claimed invention after the prosecution of a utility or plant application is closed consider filing? Answer: Effective July 14, 2003, continued prosecution application (CPA) practice was eliminated as to utility and plant applications. […] T...

MPEP Q & A 281: Time for reply to final rejection 01.08.2023

Question: What is the time for reply to a final rejection? Answer: The time for reply to a final rejection is as follows: (A) All final rejections setting a 3-month shortened statutory period (SSP) for reply should contain a form paragraph advising applicant that if the first reply is filed within 2 months of the […] The post MPEP Q & A 281: Time for reply to final rejection appeared fi...

MPEP Q & A 280: When does the revocation of a filing receipt license become effective? 18.07.2023

Question: When does the revocation of a filing receipt license become effective? Answer: The revocation becomes effective on the date on which the notice is mailed. Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found in chapter 100 of the MPEP. This chapter covers Secrecy, Access, National Security, and Foreign Filing. The answer is […] The post MPEP Q & A 280: When does the revoc...

MPEP Q & A 279: Methods of paying a maintenance fee and necessary surcharges 04.07.2023

Question: How can a maintenance fee and any necessary surcharge be made? Answer: The method of payment for the maintenance fee and any necessary surcharge shall be made in U.S. dollars and in the form of a cashier’s or certified check, Treasury note, national bank notes, or United States Postal Service money order as provided […] The post MPEP Q & A 279: Methods of paying a maintenance...

MPEP Q & A 278: Claiming the benefit of a provisional application 20.06.2023

Question: What does a petition under 37 CFR 1.78(b) require? Answer: A petition under 37 CFR 1.78(b) requires: (A) the reference required by 35 U.S.C. 119(e)and 37 CFR 1.78 to the prior-filed provisional application, which must be included in application data sheet (unless previously submitted in an application data sheet); (B) the petition fee as […] The post MPEP Q & A 278: Claiming t...

MPEP Q & A 277: Exceptions to extensions of time 06.06.2023

Question: 37 CFR 1.136(a) permits an applicant to file a petition for extension of time and a fee up to 5 months after the end of the time period set to take action except during which circumstances? Answer: 37 CFR 1.136(a) permits an applicant to file a petition for extension of time and a fee […] The post MPEP Q & A 277: Exceptions to extensions of time appeared first on Patent Educat...

MPEP Q & A 276: Examples of exemplary rationales of a prima facie case of obviousness 23.05.2023

Question: What are some examples of rationales that may support a conclusion of obviousness? Answer: Examples of rationales that may support a conclusion of obviousness include: (A) Combining prior art elements according to known methods to yield predictable results; (B) Simple substitution of one known element for another to obtain predictable results; (C) Use of […] The post MPEP Q &...

MPEP Q & A 275: Receipt of drawing after the filing date 09.05.2023

Question: What actions should happen if an examiner discovers new matter in a substitute or additional drawing? Answer: If the examiner discovers new matter in a substitute or additional drawing, the drawing should not be entered and the examiner should describe the new matter that resulted in non-entry in the next Office action. A new […] The post MPEP Q & A 275: Receipt of drawing aft...

MPEP Q & A 274: Inspection of patent files by the public 25.04.2023

Question: During what conditions would the complete file wrapper and contents of a patent application published in redacted form not be available? Answer: If an application was published in redacted form, the complete file wrapper and contents of the patent application will not be available if: The requirements of paragraphs (d)(1), (d)(2), and (d)(3) of […] The post MPEP Q & A 274: Ins...

MPEP Q & A 273: Can a request for ex parte reexamination filed on or after January 16, 2018 be filed with a reduced filing fee? 11.04.2023

Question: Can a request for ex parte reexamination filed on or after January 16, 2018 be filed with a reduced filing fee? Answer: Yes, requests for ex parte reexamination filed on or after January 16, 2018 may be filed with a reduced filing fee. This reexamination filing option was created to make it financially less burdensome for requesters […] The post MPEP Q & A 273: Can a request f...

MPEP Q & A 272: Limitation that the courts have found not to be enough to qualify as “significantly more” when recited in a claim with a judicial exception. 28.03.2023

Question: Name a limitation that the courts have found not to be enough to qualify as “significantly more” when recited in a claim with a judicial exception. Answer: Limitations that the courts have found not to be enough to qualify as “significantly more” when recited in a claim with a judicial exception include: Adding the […] The post MPEP Q & A 272: Limitatio...

MPEP Q & A 271: What are three pieces of information each patent listed in the Official Gazette may give? 14.03.2023

Question: What are three pieces of information each patent listed in the Official Gazette may give? Answer: As to each patent listed in the Official Gazette, the following information may be given: (A) Patent number; (B) Title of the invention; (C) Name of inventor(s), city, and state or country of residence; (D) Assignee’s name, city, […] The post MPEP Q & A 271: What are three p...

MPEP Q & A 270: Once an appellant has filed a notice of appeal, what situations may that appellant request that prosecution be reopened for? 28.02.2023

Question: Once an appellant has filed a notice of appeal, what situations may that appellant request that prosecution be reopened for? Answer: Once appellant has filed a notice of appeal, appellant also may request that prosecution be reopened for the following situations: In response to a new ground of rejection made in an examiner’s answer, […] The post MPEP Q & A 270: Once an appella...

MPEP Q & A 269: Two laboratory techniques the courts have recognized as well-understood, routine, conventional activities in the life science arts 14.02.2023

Question: List two laboratory techniques the courts have recognized as well-understood, routine, conventional activities in the life science arts when they are claimed in a merely generic manner (e.g., at a high level of generality) or as insignificant extra-solution activity. Answer: The courts have recognized the following laboratory techniques as well-understood, routine, conventional activity...

MPEP Q & A 268: What should the examiner do? 31.01.2023

Question: If the Board affirms a rejection against independent claim 1, reverses all rejections against dependent claim 2 and claim 3 is allowed, after expiration of the period for further appeal, what should the examiner do? Answer: If the Board affirms a rejection against independent claim 1, reverses all rejections against dependent claim 2 and […] The post MPEP Q & A 268: What shoul...

MPEP Q & A 267: What are the four purposes 35 U.S.C. 101 has been interpreted as imposing? 17.01.2023

Question: What are the four purposes 35 U.S.C. 101 has been interpreted as imposing? Answer: 35 U.S.C. 101 has been interpreted as imposing four purposes. First, 35 U.S.C. 101 limits an inventor to ONE patent for a claimed invention. If more than one patent is sought, a patent applicant will receive a statutory double patenting […] The post MPEP Q & A 267: What are the four purposes 35...

MPEP Q & A 266: Name one advantage a CPA has compared to a continuation or divisional application 03.01.2023

Question: Name one advantage a CPA has compared to a continuation or divisional application filed under 37 CFR 1.53(b). Answer: A CPA has a number of advantages compared to a continuation or divisional application filed under 37 CFR 1.53(b). For example, the papers required to be filed in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office in […] The post MPEP Q & A 266: Name one advantage a CPA has c...

MPEP Q & A 265: What is the second part of the Alice/Mayo test often referred to as? 20.12.2022

Question: What is the second part of the Alice/Mayo test often referred to as? Answer: The second part of the Alice/Mayo test is often referred to as a search for an inventive concept. An inventive concept “cannot be furnished by the unpatentable law of nature (or natural phenomenon or abstract idea) itself.” Genetic Techs. v. Merial LLC. Instead, an […] The post MPEP Q & A...

MPEP Q & A 264: How do examiners evaluate integration into a practical application? 06.12.2022

Question: How do examiners evaluate integration into a practical application? Answer: Examiners evaluate integration into a practical application by: (1) identifying whether there are any additional elements recited in the claim beyond the judicial exception(s); and (2) evaluating those additional elements individually and in combination to determine whether they integrate the exception into a pra...

MPEP Q & A 263: How is the markedly different characteristics analysis performed? 22.11.2022

Question: How is the markedly different characteristics analysis performed? Answer: The markedly different characteristics analysis compares the nature-based product limitation to its naturally occurring counterpart in its natural state. Markedly different characteristics can be expressed as the product’s structure, function, and/or other properties, and are evaluated based on what is recited in t...

MPEP Q & A 262: Give an example of a claim that does not recite mental processes because it cannot be practically performed in the human mind. 08.11.2022

Question: Give an example of a claim that does not recite mental processes because it cannot be practically performed in the human mind. Answer: Examples of claims that do not recite mental processes because they cannot be practically performed in the human mind include: a claim to a method for calculating an absolute position of […] The post MPEP Q & A 262: Give an example of a claim t...

MPEP Q & A 261: What is meant by a fundamental economic practice or principle? 25.10.2022

Question: What is meant by a fundamental economic practice or principle? Answer: The courts have used the phrases “fundamental economic practices” or “fundamental economic principles” to describe concepts relating to the economy and commerce. Fundamental economic principles or practices include hedging, insurance, and mitigating risks. The term “fundamental” is...

MPEP Q & A 257: Can an inventor apply for a patent jointly even when they did not physically work together or at the same time? 30.08.2022

Question: Can an inventor apply for a patent jointly even when they did not physically work together or at the same time? Answer: The inventive entity for a particular application is based on some contribution to at least one of the claims made by each of the named inventors. “Inventors may apply for a patent […] The post MPEP Q & A 257: Can an inventor apply for a patent jointly even w...

MPEP Q & A 256: What type of applications and proceedings may submit drawings that are not black and white line drawings via EFS-Web? 16.08.2022

Question: What type of applications and proceedings may submit photographs, color drawings, grayscale drawings, and other drawings that are not black and white line drawings via EFS-Web? Answer: Photographs, color drawings, grayscale drawings, and other drawings that are not black and white line drawings may be submitted via EFS-Web in only the following types of […] The post MPEP Q & A...

MPEP Q & A 255: When do members of a Markush group share a ‘single structural similarity’? 02.08.2022

Question: When do members of a Markush group share a ‘single structural similarity’? Answer: Members of a Markush group share a “single structural similarity” when they belong to the same recognized physical or chemical class or to the same art-recognized class (prong 1) and the members of a Markush group share a common function or […] The post MPEP Q & A 255: When do members of a Marku...

Listen to the Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast podcast in Replaio

Radio and podcasts in one app - free, with no sign-up. Install today and do not miss the launch

Get it on Google Play

Replaio is not a podcast publisher; show names, artwork and audio belong to their authors and are distributed through public RSS feeds.