Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006

Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast

Patent Bar Review

Author

Lisa Parmley, USPTO Patent Practitioner #51006

Category

Education

Latest episode

Jun 30, 2026

Where to listen?

Podcasts in the app Replaio Radio Coming soon

Podcasts are coming to the app soon. Install now and be the first to see a whole new take on podcasts

Get it on Google Play Install for free Android 5M+ downloads · 4.8 rating iOS soon

Episodes

MPEP Q & A 79: Factors When Determining Sufficient Evidence Concerning Enablement Requirement 28.02.2017

Question: List two factors to be considered when determining whether there is sufficient evidence to support a determination that a disclosure does not satisfy the enablement requirement and whether any necessary experimentation is ‘undue’. Answer: The factors to be considered when determining whether there is sufficient evidence to support a determination that a disclosure does [&#823...

MPEP Q & A 78: AIA and Applications Filed Before March 16, 2013 21.02.2017

Question: Do the changes to 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 in the AIA apply to applications filed before March 16, 2013? Answer: No, the changes to 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 in the AIA do not apply to any application filed before March 16, 2013. Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found […] The post MPEP Q & A 78: AIA and Applications Filed Before March 16, 2013 appeared first on Pat...

MPEP Q & A 77: Conclusion of an Inter Partes Reexamination Proceeding 14.02.2017

Question: List one of the ways an inter partes reexamination proceeding may be concluded. Answer: Inter partes reexamination proceedings may be concluded in one of three ways: The prosecution of the reexamination proceeding may be brought to an end, and the proceeding itself concluded, by a denial of reexamination, or vacating the reexamination proceeding, or […] The post MPEP Q & A 77:...

MPEP Q & A 76: Filing a Petition for a Covered Business Method Patent Review 07.02.2017

Question: Who may file a petition for a covered business method patent review? Answer: A petitioner may not file a petition to institute a covered business method patent review of the patent unless the petitioner, the petitioner’s real party-in-interest, or a privy of the petitioner has been sued for infringement of the patent or has […] The post MPEP Q & A 76: Filing a Petition for a C...

MPEP Q & A 75: Duty of Disclosure in Reexamination Proceedings 03.02.2017

Question: Who does the duty of disclosure in reexamination proceedings apply to? Answer: The duty of disclosure in reexamination proceedings applies to the patent owner; to each attorney or agent who represents the patent owner, and to every other individual who is substantively involved on behalf of the patent owner. Chapter Details: The answer to […] The post MPEP Q & A 75: Duty of Di...

MPEP Q & A 74: Sources of Information Material to Patentability 31.01.2017

Question: Where may information material to patentability come from? Answer: Sources of information may include: co-workers trade shows communications from or with competitors potential infringers third parties Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found in chapter 2000 of the MPEP. This chapter covers Duty of Disclosure. The answer is from the 9th […] The post MPEP Q & A...

MPEP Q & A 73: Contents of an International Application 27.01.2017

Question: What must an international application contain? Answer: Any international application must contain the following elements: request, description, claim or claims, abstract and one or more drawings (where drawings are necessary for the understanding of the invention). Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found in chapter 1800 of the MPEP. This chapter […] The post MPEP...

MPEP Q & A 72: Filing of a Certificate of Correction 24.01.2017

Question: When should a Certificate of Correction be filed instead of a reissue? Answer: While reissue is a vehicle for correcting inventorship in a patent, correction of inventorship should be effected by filing a request for a Certificate of Correction if: (A) the only change being made in the patent is to correct the inventorship; […] The post MPEP Q & A 72: Filing of a Certificate o...

MPEP Q & A 71: Bibliographic Data 20.01.2017

Question: What does bibliographic data include? Answer: Bibliographic data includes: inventor information; correspondence information; application information; representative information; domestic benefit information; foreign priority information; and applicant information. Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found in chapter 600 of the MPEP. This chapter covers Parts, Form and Con...

MPEP Q & A 70: Three Separate and Distinct Requirements of the Specification 17.01.2017

Question: What are the three separate and distinct requirements required of the specification by 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph? Answer: 35 U.S.C. 112(a) and pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph require that the specification include the following three separate and distinct requirements: A written description of the invention; The manner […] The post MPEP Q &#...

MPEP Q & A 69: Submission of a Protest 13.01.2017

Question: When may a protest be submitted? Answer: A protest must be submitted prior to the mailing of a Notice of Allowance and the application must be pending when the examiner receives the information. Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found in chapter 1900 of the MPEP. This chapter covers Protests. The […] The post MPEP Q & A 69: Submission of a Protest appeared fi...

MPEP Q & A 68: Ways in Which Possession May be Shown 10.01.2017

Question: List one way possession may be shown. Answer: Possession may be shown in many ways. For example, possession may be shown by describing an actual reduction to practice of the claimed invention. Possession may also be shown by a clear depiction of the invention in detailed drawings or in structural chemical formulas which permit […] The post MPEP Q & A 68: Ways in Which Possessi...

MPEP Q & A 67: First Step of the Recapture Rule 06.01.2017

Question: What is the first step of the three-step process for the recapture rule? Answer: The first step of the three-step process for the recapture rule is: (1) first, we determine whether, and in what respect, the reissue claims are broader in scope than the original patent claims; Chapter Details: The answer to this question […] The post MPEP Q & A 67: First Step of the Recapture Ru...

MPEP Q & A 66: Relevance of Long-Felt Need and the Failure of Others 03.01.2017

Question: What three things does the relevance of long-felt need and the failure of others to the issue of obviousness depend on? Answer: The relevance of long-felt need and the failure of others to the issue of obviousness depends on several factors: First, the need must have been a persistent one that was recognized by those […] The post MPEP Q & A 66: Relevance of Long-Felt Need and...

MPEP Q & A 65: Underlying Factual Inquiries of Obviousness 30.12.2016

Question: List one of the underlying factual inquiries of obviousness. Answer: The factual inquiries enunciated by the Court are as follows: Determining the scope and content of the prior art; and Ascertaining the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art; and Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. Chapter Details: […] The post MPEP Q & A 65: Under...

MPEP Q & A 64: Strongest Rationale for Combining References 27.12.2016

Question: What is the strongest rationale for combining references? Answer: The strongest rationale for combining references is a recognition, expressly or impliedly in the prior art or drawn from a convincing line of reasoning based on established scientific principles or legal precedent, that some advantage or expected beneficial result would have been produced by their […] The post MPEP Q...

MPEP Q & A 63: Grounds of Refusal for a Notification of Refusal 23.12.2016

Question: What may the grounds of refusal for a notification of refusal be based on? Answer: The grounds of refusal may be in the form of a rejection based on a condition for patentability under title 35, United States Code (which may include 35 U.S.C. 171, 102, 103, or 112), a requirement for restriction (where […] The post MPEP Q & A 63: Grounds of Refusal for a Notification of Refusa...

MPEP Q & A 62: Circumstances Where Applicants May Make Amendments 20.12.2016

Question: Name one circumstance where an applicant may make amendments. Answer: The applicant may amend: before or after the first Office action and also after the second Office actions; after final rejection, if certain criteria are met; after the date of filing a notice of appeal, if the amendment meets certain criteria; and when and […] The post MPEP Q & A 62: Circumstances Where App...

MPEP Q & A 61: Passing Jurisdiction onto the Board 16.12.2016

Question: When does jurisdiction over the proceeding pass to the Board? Answer: Jurisdiction over the proceeding passes to the Board on filing of a reply brief or the expiration of time to file a reply brief. Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found in chapter 1200 of the MPEP. This chapter covers […] The post MPEP Q & A 61: Passing Jurisdiction onto the Board appeared...

MPEP Q & A 60: Contents of a Request for Republication 13.12.2016

Question: What must a request for republication include? Answer: A request for republication must include: a copy of the application in compliance with the Office Electronic Filing System (EFS) requirements, the publication fee; and the processing fee. Chapter Details: The answer to this question can be found in chapter 1100 of the MPEP. This chapter […] The post MPEP Q & A 60: Contents...

MPEP Q & A 59: Concluding an Ex Parte Reexamination Proceeding 09.12.2016

Question: What is one way an ex parte reexamination proceeding may be concluded? Answer: Ex parte reexamination proceedings may be concluded in one of four ways: The prosecution of the proceeding may be brought to an end, and the proceeding itself concluded, by a denial of reexamination, or vacating the reexamination proceeding, or terminating the […] The post MPEP Q & A 59: Concluding...

MPEP Q & A 58: Electronic Publications as Printed Publications 06.12.2016

Question: Is an electronic publication considered to be a “printed publication” within the meaning of 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) and pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(a) and (b) provided the publication was accessible to persons concerned with the art to which the document relates? Answer: Yes, an electronic publication is considered to be a printed publication within the […] The post MPEP Q &...

MPEP Q & A 57: Government Organizations that Cannot Qualify as Nonprofit Organizations 02.12.2016

Question: List two types of government organizations that cannot qualify as a nonprofit organization. Answer: Government organizations, whether domestic or foreign, cannot qualify as nonprofit organizations. These include: A government research facility or other government-owned corporation could not qualify. Although the Federal government agencies do not qualify as nonprofit organizations for pa...

MPEP Q & A 56: Four Conditions That Establish a Statutory Bar Under Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(d) 29.11.2016

Question: Name the four conditions which, if all are present, establish a statutory bar under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(d). Answer: Pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102(d) establishes four conditions which, if all are present, establish a statutory bar against the granting of a patent in this country: (A) The foreign application must be filed more than 12 […] The post MPEP Q & A 56: Four Conditions That E...

MPEP Q & A 55: Obtaining Permission to File a Patent Application Abroad 25.11.2016

Question: What are the two ways in which permission to file a patent application abroad may be obtained? Answer: The two ways in which permission to file a patent application abroad may be obtained include: either a petition for a foreign filing license may be granted, or an applicant may wait 6 months after filing […] The post MPEP Q & A 55: Obtaining Permission to File a Patent Applic...

Listen to the Patent Bar MPEP Q & A Podcast podcast in Replaio

Radio and podcasts in one app - free, with no sign-up. Install today and do not miss the launch

Get it on Google Play

Replaio is not a podcast publisher; show names, artwork and audio belong to their authors and are distributed through public RSS feeds.