Nyay Samachar

Nabha Power Ltd. vs. Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd. & Ors. 2025 INSC 1002 This landmark case examines whether the withdrawal of "deemed export benefits" under Para 8.3 of the Foreign Trade Policy 2009-2014, and related DGFT notifications, qualify as a “Change in Law” under Article 13 of the Power Purchase Agreement (PPA). #supremecourt #contractlaw #electricitylaw

Welcome to Nyay Samachar! Today’s episode features a landmark Supreme Court judgment in Mahesh Chand (Dead) Through LRs vs. Brijesh Kumar & Ors. (2025 INSC 1005). Focus on statutes: Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Order VII Rule 10), Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 (Sections 143 & 145). Key legal issue: Jurisdiction of Civil vs. Revenue Courts on land leased for...

Supreme Court shakes up the rules! Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd. vs Vinod & Ors. brings a new twist to compensation and land rights for transmission projects.

Supreme Court Strikes Balance on Stray Dogs: Shelter, Sterilisation and Safety. In this landmark judgement, the SC addresses growing menace of stray dogs on the streets of Delhi and NCR, and tragic impact on children’s lives. It highlights the delicate balance between animal welfare and the law. Listen to the decision that will become a milestone in legal and civic governance for the future. #anim...

Sunil S/o Darshan Saberwal vs. Star India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors Bombay High Court on “LOOTERE” title dispute! Can a film/web-series title be protected under copyright? What about producer association registrations? Tap to listen to audio summary of this case #medialaw #IPLaw #copyright #indianlaw

Sh. Shabuddin vs. State of Telangana 2025 INSC 999 - An important legal principle reaffirmed by the Supreme Court: Mere possession of alleged stolen property is NOT enough for conviction under Section 411 IPC. Listen to this audio summary to know what criminal jurisprudence demands … #section411IPC #evidencelaw ##supremecourt

TRANS GENDER PERSONS ENTITLED TO HAVE THEIR NAME, GENDER REFLECTED IN ALL EDUCATIONAL DOCS - MANIPUR HIGH COURT IN Dr. Beoncy Laishram vs. The State of Manipur & Ors. This case reinforces constitutional rights and the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Act, 2019. Listen to the full judgment breakdown and stay updated with the latest in legal progress! #transgenderrights #manipurhighcourt #...

🚨  BREAKING JUDGMENT  🚨 - Smt. Archana Patil vs. State of Karnataka (Karnataka High Court) Cr. Petition No. 12777/2024 A  trailblazing ruling  from Karnataka High Court crushes outdated myths— POCSO Act is  GENDER NEUTRAL ! ⚖️ Sexual offenses against boys are real and punishable, no matter the perpetrator’s gender. Justice served loud and clear! 🎧  Listen to the full verdict that’s reshaping ch...

In this landmark Supreme Court judgment of 2025, the apex court addressed a critical question of inheritance rights for tribal women and their legal heirs. The case of  Ram Charan & Ors. vs. Sukhram & Ors.  challenges the traditional denial of equal property rights to women of Scheduled Tribes under prevailing customs and laws. The Court decisively held that in the absence of any proven cu...

In this episode, we delve into the Supreme Court of India's recent judgment in the case of  Smt. Uma Devi & Ors. vs. Sri Anand Kumar & Ors.  (2025), a significant dispute involving partition and limitation laws in ancestral property. The Court revisited the principles governing oral family settlements, the importance of registered sale deeds as constructive notice, and the scope of lim...

In this episode, we delve into the Supreme Court’s landmark judgment in the case of Basavaraj v. Indira (2024), which highlights critical aspects of amendment of pleadings in civil suits concerning partition and compromise decrees. The Court decisively examined whether a late amendment challenging an existing compromise decree can be allowed, especially at the fag end of trial, emphasizing princip...

In this episode, we explore the landmark Supreme Court judgment in  Shashidhar and Others vs. Ashwini Uma Mathad and Another  (2024 INSC 485), a pivotal case on Hindu inheritance law and coparcenary rights. The Court clarified crucial distinctions between ancestral and self-acquired property, the rights of daughters in partition suits, and the extent of their share under Hindu law. This detailed a...

In this episode, we dive deep into the Supreme Court of India's groundbreaking judgment in  Revanasiddappa & Anr. vs. Mallikarjun & Ors  (2023), which clarifies the inheritance rights of children born from void or voidable Hindu marriages under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, and the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. Delivered by Chief Justice Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, the three-judge bench ru...

In this episode, we dive into the landmark Supreme Court judgment in  M. Sivadasan (Dead) through LRs. & Ors. vs. A. Soudamini (Dead) through LRs. & Ors.  (2023), which sheds light on the complexities of inheritance rights under Hindu Mitakshara law, especially concerning agricultural land and the rights of daughters versus male heirs. Discover how the Court reaffirmed possession as a key...

In this landmark Supreme Court judgment, the Court examined the intricate nuances of inheritance rights under Hindu succession law, focusing on the impact of a Release Deed executed by a pre-deceased son in relation to his father’s separate property. The judgment clarifies the doctrine of estoppel in inheritance claims, the effect of valuable consideration, and the application of Section 8 of the...

Discover the landmark Supreme Court judgment on the interpretation of Section 6 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, as amended by the Hindu Succession (Amendment) Act, 2005. This historic ruling brings clarity on daughters' rights as coparceners in Hindu Mitakshara joint family property, affirming their equal entitlement with sons by birth, irrespective of whether the father or other coparcener...

Abhinav Mohan Delkar vs. State of Mah & Ors. 2025 INSC 990 - The Court examines whether continuous harassment, humiliation, or allegations—without a clear, proximate triggering act—can amount to abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC. Listen to this audio to know what the Court opines 🎧 #section306IPC #abetmenttosuicide #criminallaw #Supreme Court

MV Leelavathi vs. Dr. C. R. Swamy 2025 INSC 994 addresses divorce and alimony under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 where the Court enhanced permanent alimony…Listen to the grounds the Court gave 🎧 #permanentalimony #hindumarriageact

Khaja Mohaideen & Anr. vs. State of Tamil Nadu & Anr. (2025 INSC 970) revolving around reversal of a trial court acquittal in a case involving charges under Sections 498A, 306, and 109 IPC related to alleged dowry harassment and abetment of suicide. Listen to know what Supreme Court said about the limits of revision jurisdiction… #498A #dyingdeclaration #acquittal

M/S Sethia Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. vs. Mafatlal Mangilal Kothari & Ors. (2025 INSC 985) - In this case, the Apex Court addressed the restoration of a long-dismissed appeal involving property dispute and eviction. A key law point here is that courts must exercise caution and consider possible third-party rights when condoning excessive delay (here, a staggering 5,250 days), in restoration applicat...

Pernod Ricard India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. vs. Karanveer Singh Chhabra (2025 INSC 981) is a Supreme Court decision clarifying key principles of trademark law, particularly the tests for similarity, distinctiveness, and consumer confusion. It emphasizes the "anti-dissection rule" (a mark must be viewed as a whole), the dominance of distinctive elements, and the necessity of likelihood of confusion for in...

The Supreme Court in A. Ranjithkumar vs. E. Kavitha (2025 INSC 978) exercised its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to dissolve a Hindu marriage due to irretrievable breakdown, after the parties had lived separately for 15 years. The Court emphasized that cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act must be directly attributable to the spouse, not third parties. #article142...

Supreme Court cancels OLYMPIC MEDALIST SUSHIL KUMAR’s bail in 2021 murder case in Chhatrasal stadium. #bailcancellation #olympicwrestler

Convicted in the infamous NITISH KATARA murder, Sukhdev Yadav completed 20 years of jail term, raising a vital question: Can he walk free after a fixed sentence, or does “life imprisonment” mean more? The Supreme Court’s July 2025 judgment reshapes what ‘life’ truly means for convicts. #remission #furlougn #lifeimprisonment

Get ready to dive into a landmark Supreme Court judgment that reshapes the landscape ofrenewable energy tariffs in India! In this episode, we unravel the complex legal battle betweenGujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited and Green Infra Corporate Wind Private Limited, where the courtruled on the crucial issue of tariff determination for wind energy projects and the rights of power producers regarding ac...