Exploring the Bible with Mel Barror

Mary is the pivotal human person of all time and the counterpart to Eve of the creation story, as well as, in God’s plan of Salvation. We honor her because she is the ’Mother of God’ who was kept free of all sin because of her role in ‘God’s Plan.’ This may be difficult for some people to accept or understand, but hopefully, you will be better acquainted with this concept after you listen to the f...

Mary is the pivotal human person of all time and the counterpart to Eve of the creation story, as well as, in God’s plan of Salvation. We honor her because she is the ’Mother of God’ who was kept free of all sin because of her role in ‘God’s Plan.’ This may be difficult for some people to accept or understand, but hopefully, you will be better acquainted with this concept after you listen to the f...

Mary is the pivotal human person of all time and the counterpart to Eve of the creation story, as well as, in God’s plan of Salvation. We honor her because she is the ’Mother of God’ who was kept free of all sin because of her role in ‘God’s Plan.’ This may be difficult for some people to accept or understand, but hopefully, you will be better acquainted with this concept after you listen to the f...

These two “Books” of the New Testament are not related in any way. They are here together for teaching purposes due to their brevity and similarity in form and purpose. Their writers are unknown, and they are clearly not ‘letters’ in the understood manner, rather, they are more like written sermons or teachings of late first-century Christian thinking. But you will be pleasantly surprised to read...

These two “Books” of the New Testament are not related in any way. They are here together for teaching purposes due to their brevity and similarity in form and purpose. Their writers are unknown, and they are clearly not ‘letters’ in the understood manner, rather, they are more like written sermons or teachings of late first-century Christian thinking. But you will be pleasantly surprised to read...

These two “Books” of the New Testament are not related in any way. They are here together for teaching purposes due to their brevity and similarity in form and purpose. Their writers are unknown, and they are clearly not ‘letters’ in the understood manner, rather, they are more like written sermons or teachings of late first-century Christian thinking. But you will be pleasantly surprised to read...

These two “Books” of the New Testament are not related in any way. They are here together for teaching purposes due to their brevity and similarity in form and purpose. Their writers are unknown, and they are clearly not ‘letters’ in the understood manner, rather, they are more like written sermons or teachings of late first-century Christian thinking. But you will be pleasantly surprised to read...

These two “Books” of the New Testament are not related in any way. They are here together for teaching purposes due to their brevity and similarity in form and purpose. Their writers are unknown, and they are clearly not ‘letters’ in the understood manner, rather, they are more like written sermons or teachings of late first-century Christian thinking. But you will be pleasantly surprised to read...

These two “Books” of the New Testament are not related in any way. They are here together for teaching purposes due to their brevity and similarity in form and purpose. Their writers are unknown, and they are clearly not ‘letters’ in the understood manner, rather, they are more like written sermons or teachings of late first-century Christian thinking. But you will be pleasantly surprised to read...

These two “Books” of the New Testament are not related in any way. They are here together for teaching purposes due to their brevity and similarity in form and purpose. Their writers are unknown, and they are clearly not ‘letters’ in the understood manner, rather, they are more like written sermons or teachings of late first-century Christian thinking. But you will be pleasantly surprised to read...

These two “Books” of the New Testament are not related in any way. They are here together for teaching purposes due to their brevity and similarity in form and purpose. Their writers are unknown, and they are clearly not ‘letters’ in the understood manner, rather, they are more like written sermons or teachings of late first-century Christian thinking. But you will be pleasantly surprised to read...

These two “Books” of the New Testament are not related in any way. They are here together for teaching purposes due to their brevity and similarity in form and purpose. Their writers are unknown, and they are clearly not ‘letters’ in the understood manner, rather, they are more like written sermons or teachings of late first-century Christian thinking. But you will be pleasantly surprised to read...

These two “Books” of the New Testament are not related in any way. They are here together for teaching purposes due to their brevity and similarity in form and purpose. Their writers are unknown, and they are clearly not ‘letters’ in the understood manner, rather, they are more like written sermons or teachings of late first-century Christian thinking. But you will be pleasantly surprised to read...

“John” is thought of as the gospel of love because of the many times it is mentioned. It was written near the end of the first century, after the writer and other Christians of that time had time to ponder the teachings of the other evangelists, and for John to develop his own theology. It is more theological than the other Gospels which are called the “synoptic” gospels, because of their similari...

“John” is thought of as the gospel of love because of the many times it is mentioned. It was written near the end of the first century, after the writer and other Christians of that time had time to ponder the teachings of the other evangelists, and for John to develop his own theology. It is more theological than the other Gospels which are called the “synoptic” gospels, because of their similari...

“John” is thought of as the gospel of love because of the many times it is mentioned. It was written near the end of the first century, after the writer and other Christians of that time had time to ponder the teachings of the other evangelists, and for John to develop his own theology. It is more theological than the other Gospels which are called the “synoptic” gospels, because of their similari...

“John” is thought of as the gospel of love because of the many times it is mentioned. It was written near the end of the first century, after the writer and other Christians of that time had time to ponder the teachings of the other evangelists, and for John to develop his own theology. It is more theological than the other Gospels which are called the “synoptic” gospels, because of their similari...

“John” is thought of as the gospel of love because of the many times it is mentioned. It was written near the end of the first century, after the writer and other Christians of that time had time to ponder the teachings of the other evangelists, and for John to develop his own theology. It is more theological than the other Gospels which are called the “synoptic” gospels, because of their similari...

“John” is thought of as the gospel of love because of the many times it is mentioned. It was written near the end of the first century, after the writer and other Christians of that time had time to ponder the teachings of the other evangelists, and for John to develop his own theology. It is more theological than the other Gospels which are called the “synoptic” gospels, because of their similari...

“John” is thought of as the gospel of love because of the many times it is mentioned. It was written near the end of the first century, after the writer and other Christians of that time had time to ponder the teachings of the other evangelists, and for John to develop his own theology. It is more theological than the other Gospels which are called the “synoptic” gospels, because of their similari...

“John” is thought of as the gospel of love because of the many times it is mentioned. It was written near the end of the first century, after the writer and other Christians of that time had time to ponder the teachings of the other evangelists, and for John to develop his own theology. It is more theological than the other Gospels which are called the “synoptic” gospels, because of their similari...

“John” is thought of as the gospel of love because of the many times it is mentioned. It was written near the end of the first century, after the writer and other Christians of that time had time to ponder the teachings of the other evangelists, and for John to develop his own theology. It is more theological than the other Gospels which are called the “synoptic” gospels, because of their similari...

“John” is thought of as the gospel of love because of the many times it is mentioned. It was written near the end of the first century, after the writer and other Christians of that time had time to ponder the teachings of the other evangelists, and for John to develop his own theology. It is more theological than the other Gospels which are called the “synoptic” gospels, because of their similari...

“Romans” begins the first written theology in the many writings of the early Church. The lessons of this session will give a better understanding of Paul’s transformation from persecutor to evangelist and extend the theology of all the previous writings.

“Romans” begins the first written theology in the many writings of the early Church. The lessons of this session will give a better understanding of Paul’s transformation from persecutor to evangelist and extend the theology of all the previous writings.