The Rational Nationalist

People love dividing up into teams and killing each other, even when those teams are based on religions preaching pretty much the opposite. We'll examine the Crusades and why Joan of Arc was willing to fight and die for a Dauphin who viewed people like her as little more than cattle.

We'll take a look to see what we'll need to get out of the Iran negotiations for it to have been worth risking a nuclear World War 3. Also, we'll start to make sense of the contours of a new global political system in which we're all players. 

Is Trump changing goals in the middle of the Iran War by substituting nuclear disarmament for "unconditional surrender"? Is he actually negotiating with anyone in Iran? And, finally, is TACO (Trump Always Cowards Out) the sloganeering equivalent of poking a bear in the eye? Do we have answers, or just more questions? Find out on this week's episode.

Does Donald Trump's obsession with being the center of attention skew his views on the Iran War? What about the prosecutions facing Bibi, or the potential impact of the elections on the American midterms?   We'll explore the personal motives of both leaders and how they may impact their decision-making process, focusing on their decision to attack Iran.

The American public's position on the Iran War is surprisingly united and clear - do it quickly and cleanly, or don't do it at all. Trump is wagering his entire legacy on having this thing wrapped up by midterms. 

Trump clearly has reasons for his actions in Iran, but that doesn't mean they're good reasons. Just like weak evidence is still evidence, bad reasons are still reasons. We'll also evaluate the competence or lack thereof of the 'bros running the show' when it comes to Trump's foreign policy team.   Finally, we'll look ahead to the coming mental health pandemic as the TDS crowd tries to cope with th...

The first in our series analyzing and drawing lessons from the latest Middle East conflict. We'll talk a lot about organized crime, since relationships between criminal organizations are, not surprisingly, similar to relationships among governments.   We'll also look at why it's important to keep your promises, zooming in specifically on Obama's Syrian "red line" and his inversion of TR's axiom. 

This episode examines the proper role of the judiciary, which, contrary to popular belief, is not to rubber-stamp the President's agenda or organize the resistance to it. In fact, it's surprisingly simple - just interpret the damn law.

The basic thesis is that Americans don't trust our institutions - the media, academia, and, in this case, medical professionals - because many of these institutions have been taken over by those driven by ideological agendas.   Restoring faith requires ensuring that those running these institutions are operating in good faith.

A lot of problems in this country could be fixed if a bunch of forty-somethings and older could figure out how to act like adults. Humility and emotional self-discipline are life skills this country desperately needs among its population.

It's not just TDS tearing this country apart - both the left and the right are so threatened by the tyrannical tendencies of their political opponents that they blind themselves to the threats coming from their own side of the aisle. On this episode, instead of pointing fingers, we'll examine the tactics used by totalitarian and authoritarian movements more generally.

Why do nations struggle to strategically pursue their long-term interests, even when they're clear and obvious? It's because the nation is an abstract concept incapable of conscious decision-making; instead, the decision is made by a number of individual human beings, most of whom will inevitably be selfish assholes. We'll examine how individual incentives undermine group interests in this episode...

We'll take a look at how a petty, partisan pissing match between Chuck Schumer and Mitch McConnell took the once respected, impartial judiciary and turned it into a carbon copy of their own institution - a partisan joke that's devolved from a deliberative decision-making body to a literal streetfight. 

A democracy is only as strong as its people, and the American people kind of suck right now. At least we aren't Europeans, I guess. In this episode, we'll look at how the moral fabric of the people, i.e., their willingness to put aside individual interests to work for the common good, is an underrated and often overlooked part of what makes nations great.

Why do smart people so often act stupidly? As is often the case, we’ve known the answer since the time of the Greeks – it’s hubris, dummy. We’ll talk about how smart people are often so in love with their own intellectual superiority that it nullifies whatever epistemic edge they may have (I just learned the word ‘epistemic’ and, thus, am using/misusing it all over the place).

Power is what it's all about - all of politics is nothing more than the pursuit of power. On this episode, we'll look at why power is so alluring and get a little bit more judgmental than usual, looking at why people SHOULD pursue power.    Then, because what people SHOULD do doesn't matter, we'll look at what they actually do.

The Iranian people are at it again, rising up against the ayatollahs. How far will they take it this time, and what can/should we do to help? Also, how much should the US care about democracy and democratic principles in our foreign policy approach?   Note: There is a quip about Davos that was accurate as of the time of the recording; however, they have since expelled the Iranian minister.

We take a look at Trump's foreign policy and what we can extrapolate from the Maduro raid, Iran strikes, and the National Security Strategy. Basically, Trump loves a good bargain, likes to stay flexible, and isn't a fan of either Europeans or Congress.

A lot of people are saying that Maduro's kidnapping/capture/extradition/etc. violates international law; others say that international law is a joke and it's naive to care. On this episode, we'll look at this argument, where international law comes from, and how it coincides with basic social norms such as not farting in an elevator.

With Trump's push to redistrict everything under the sun controlled by Republicans - and Newsom's attempt to establish himself as the Democratic frontrunner by outdoing him - gerrymandering is more relevant in 2026 than ever before. Here's a look at how the process leads directly to our hyper-partisan political environment.

How do you know your boss is having an affair with his secretary? We talk about how we use our senses to form the reality we live in, which ultimately is nothing more than a mental construction of our minds, and the impact that communications with others have on this reality.

Facts may be facts, but they can be interpreted very differently. These differences account for the fact that Republicans and Democrats often seem to live in different worlds. Also, I'll take half an hour to discuss a single question and spend a lot of time insulting someone who probably doesn't deserve it.

What would happen in a world with no racism and no sexism? For one thing, a lot of people (activists, NGOs, academics, pundits, etc.) would be out of work. This episode looks at an industry of individuals making their living off fighting social injustice and the perverse incentives this creates.

We look at how Americans have divided political discourse into right- and left-wing silos, and how this makes it more convenient to hate one another with optimal efficiency.

We examine the importance of making decisions based on how things are, rather than how we think they should be, using the Russia-Ukraine peace plan as a case study.