fr

Bristows LLP

Bristows' Podcast

Never content to do the bare minimum, we've always been at the forefront of change. You could say we are and always have been a bit different from other law firms. Our legal expertise joined up with our science and technology backgrounds means we understand your business and can talk the same language. And that's essentially what we cover in this podcast. A truly independent approach to litigation, transactions and advice throughout the world.

N'hésitez pas à visiter le site du podcast et à soutenir son créateur : www.bristows.com

Auteur

Bristows LLP

Catégorie

Business

Site du podcast

www.bristows.com

Dernier épisode

18 sept. 2026

Où écouter ?

Les podcasts dans l'appli Replaio Radio Bientôt disponible

Les podcasts arrivent très bientôt dans l'appli. Installe-la dès maintenant et découvre en avant-première une toute nouvelle façon de vivre les podcasts

Télécharger sur Google Play Installe-la gratuitement Android près de 10 M de téléchargements · note de 4,8 iOS bientôt

Épisodes

Low value data breaches (2021) 30.06.2021

Litigation experts Toby Headdon and Victoria Baron discuss the level of compensation assigned for low value data breaches and privacy related claims as they're rising across all different sectors.  What is the type of damages that can be recovered for breaches of data protection law? What challenges will all those involved face in these types of claims? In this episode they’ll look at a few k...

Trade mark infringement - what can we learn from Fox v Teleta? 29.06.2021

A recent trade mark dispute, heard before the IPEC, covering the law on bad faith and threats in Fox Group International Ltd and Teleta Pharma Limited was handed down on 23 June 2021. The parties deal in aesthetic and cosmetic products and the case is a cautionary tale for brands, to always check that suspect goods are, in fact, infringing their marks. Abigail Wise discusses the background and con...

Brexit: Impacts on core intellectual property rights in the UK 16.06.2021

In this final episode of our Bristows’ Designs and Copyright Review of the Year podcast series, Toby Headdon and Jake Palmer discuss the impact of Brexit on some core intellectual property rights. How has Brexit impacted UK copyright law, database rights and trade marks? “The UK has sought to plug any gaps in trade mark protection arising as a result of our departure from the EU.”

Brexit: How is it effecting trade marks in the UK? 03.06.2021

Abigail Wise and Stephanie Taylor review the repercussions of Brexit within the IP world in this final episode from our Review of UK and European Trade Mark Cases podcast series. What are the main changes to trade marks and what should brand owners be thinking about to make sure they are fully protected in the EU and the UK? Tune in to hear their recommendations.

CJEU’s decision in Coty v Amazon - Parallel imports and platform liability 18.05.2021

 In this episode of the Review of UK and European Trade Mark Cases podcast, Abigail Wise and Stephanie Taylor discuss Parallel Imports and Platform Liability as decided by the CJEU in Coty v Amazon. Coty alleged that two Amazon group companies were committing trade mark infringement.

Freddy v HUGZ 18.05.2021

In this episode of our Bristows’ Designs and Copyright Review of the Year podcast series, Lucie Fortune and Milly Wickson explore the decision which was handed down in November 2020 in the UK Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, or IPEC, concerning some ‘body-enhancing’ jeans – Freddy SPA v HUGZ Clothing. They pay particular focus to the allegations of UK unregistered design right infringement...

The High Court’s decision in Photobox’s use of FREEPRINTS 06.05.2021

In this episode of the Review of UK and European Trade Mark Cases podcast, Abigail Wise and Stephanie Taylor review the High Court’s decision in relation to Photobox’s use of FREEPRINTS in respect of a free printing app.  They cover what the High Court considers when assessing whether trade mark infringement had occurred and also provide their key take away from the case. 

Court of Appeals decision in The Racing Partnership v Sports Information Services 06.05.2021

Continuing on with our Bristows’ Designs and Copyright Review of the Year podcast series, Toby Headdon and Charlie Hawes focus this episode on the decision of the Court of Appeal in The Racing Partnership v Sports Information Services.   This is a particularly interesting case as it concerns commercially valuable data - in this instance sports betting data. 

Pay-for-delay and the duty to retain documents: The CJEU’s judgment in Lundbeck 29.04.2021

In this follow-up episode of our podcast series on patent settlement agreements and competition law, Sophie Lawrance and Helena Connors will cover the key takeaways from the Court of Justice’s long-awaited judgment in Lundbeck . Missed an episode? Find our latest podcasts and videos here . For more information on the work we do, see our patent litigation and competition litigation practice area pa...

Monster Energy’s opposition to a HYBRID mark 27.04.2021

In this episode of the Review of UK and European Trade Mark Cases podcast, Abigail Wise and Stephanie Taylor review Monster Energy’s recent opposition to Robot Energy Limited’s application for the mark HYBRID in a stylised form, covering class 32.

CJEU’s 2020 judgment in the Recorded Artists Actors Performers Ltd case 27.04.2021

In this episode of Bristows’ Designs and Copyright Review of the Year podcast, Andy Butcher and Sukanya Majumdar discuss the Court of Justice of the European Union’s judgment of September 2020 in the Recorded Artists Actors Performers Ltd case.

CJEU decision in Brompton Bicycle 07.04.2021

Tim Heaps and Sara Sefton discuss the landmark CJEU decision in Brompton Bicycle handed down in June 2020. It’s a case in which the courts give consideration to whether copyright applies to technical designs. Over the course of this podcast, they explore how this is very much a judgment that focuses primarily on the requirement of originality for copyright subsistence.

easyGroup Limited v Easyfly S.A 07.04.2021

Abigail Wise and Stephanie Taylor provide the latest guidance on jurisdiction and without notice applications in their latest podcast. In this episode, they focus on the recent High Court judgment of easyGroup Limited v Easyfly S.A. 

Response v Edinburgh Woollen Mill 25.03.2021

The first podcast in a series linked to our annual review of design & copyright cases for 2020.  Sean Ibbetson and Marc Linsner discuss the High Court decision in Response Clothing v Edinburgh Woollen Mill, as well as the implications of the CJEU decision in Cofemel .

Distinctiveness of figurative marks – Louis Vuitton Malletier v EUIPO, T-105/19, 10 June 2020 24.03.2021

Abigail Wise and Stephanie Taylor lead this discussion on the General Court’s decision which discussed an application to invalidate Louis Vuitton’s chequerboard trade mark. 

Practical implications of negotiating and drafting patent settlements 16.03.2021

Pat Treacy and Erik Müürsepp round up our podcast series on patent settlement agreements and competition law with a look at some practical considerations for those involved in the negotiation and drafting of patent settlement agreements. Starting with common mistakes which may inadvertently lead to issues from a competition law perspective, Pat and Erik discuss some of the issues that frequently a...

Does it make a difference if a settlement agreement also has pro-competitive effects? 16.03.2021

In episode six of our podcast series on patent settlement agreements and competition law, Sophie Lawrance and Olivia Henry discuss the pro-competitive effects that may be associated with patent settlement agreements, the extent to which they are relevant to the assessment of whether Article 101(1) has been infringed ‘by object’ and why this matters. Listen to our previous podcast: Restrictions of...

What questions about patent settlements remain unanswered? 16.03.2021

In short: quite a few! Sophie Lawrance , Katie Cambrook and Helena Connors lead this penultimate episode in our podcast series on the competition law issues arising in relation to patent settlement agreements. In this episode, they look ahead and discuss  some of the outstanding points which may arise in the context of patent settlement agreements but which have not yet arisen in any of the cases...

Identifying the relevant market & how to tell if patentees and potential infringers are competitors 15.03.2021

In the third episode of our podcast series, Sophie Lawrance and Katie Cambrook provide some key insights into the identification of the “relevant market” and the assessment of whether the parties to a patent settlement are competitors.  As well as setting out the basics, they explore some of the nuances – touching on the particular difficulties associated with identifying the relevant market in a...

Restrictions of competition ‘by object’ – what does this mean and why does it matter? 15.03.2021

In the fourth episode of our podcast series on patent settlement agreements and competition law, Edwin Bond introduces  the concept of restrictions of competition ‘by object’ under Art 101 TFEU. During this podcast, Edwin explores the distinction between ‘by object’ and ‘by effect’ restrictions; the  diagram below helps illustrate a few examples of types of conduct that typically – although not al...

Does it matter if a patent settlement agreement includes a no-challenge clause? 15.03.2021

Pat Treacy presents episode five in our podcast series regarding the competition law issues associated with patent settlement agreements.   In this episode, Pat considers the role played by, inter alia , no-challenge clauses in patent settlement agreements and, in anticipation of the Court of Justice decision in Lundbeck later this month, the circumstances in which they may give rise to competitio...

What is a value transfer and why does it matter? 11.03.2021

Value transfers are a common feature of patent settlement agreements. For example, under a patent settlement agreement, the alleged infringer (often a generic company) may agree to pay damages and/or future royalties to the patentee (if the settlement also results in a licence). Other forms of payment, such as a contribution to the litigation costs of either party, may be made to enable a settleme...

An introduction to patent settlement agreements and pay-for-delay 11.03.2021

Today we kick off our new podcast series, in which we will be exploring the competition law issues associated with patent settlement agreements.  Following the Court of Justice’s judgment in Generics UK (‘Paroxetine’) last year and in eager anticipation of its ruling in Lundbeck (‘Citalopram’) later this month, we will be examining the current status of the law and highlighting practical tips for...

Bristows' Brands, Designs & Copyright - Introduction to podcast series 25.02.2021

Bristows' Brands, Designs & Copyright group introduce our upcoming publications - Trade Marks Review of the Year and Designs & Copyright Review of the Year .  Toby Headdon , Abbie Wise and Stephanie Taylor talk through why we're changing the format of our launch to a podcast series as well as case law and developments we will cover. Trade mark cases include: Louis Vuitton's...

Advancement in visual technology: the good, the bad and the ugly (2020) 16.10.2020

Faye Harrison and Rosalie Hayes talk about deepfakes and facial recognition technology and discuss how they can hurt both privacy rights and even our trust into the media, law enforcement, and politics.   Tune in to listen to our data protection experts debate on the potential solutions to balance freedom of expression and enforcement against fake content; dos and don'ts of using facial recog...

Écoute le podcast Bristows' Podcast sur Replaio

La radio et les podcasts dans une seule appli - gratuite, sans inscription. Installe-la dès aujourd'hui et ne rate pas le lancement

Télécharger sur Google Play

Replaio n'est pas éditeur de podcasts ; les noms des émissions, les visuels et l'audio appartiennent à leurs auteurs et sont diffusés via des flux RSS publics